Live data from Hacker News

Ask HN: Which great products didn't succeed?

news.ycombinator.com

451–460 of 648 posts

Re: Ask HN: Which great products didn't succeed?

#451
Wow, I’m surprised there’s nothing about the Lisp Machines/Smalltalk... Remember ‘Worse is Better’?

And there is Xanadu, the ultimate hypermedia system. It’s a pity that no one (who could fund them) really understood the concept back then and it became vaporware...

Re: Ask HN: Which great products didn't succeed?

#453
post #448

Excluding some of the mentioned ones like Google Reader, ICQ, Winamp etc. All them were at one point in time Champion in their own respective domain. They succeed at the time, so I don't see how it is a failure. They could just be more accurately described as killed or failed to move forward and compete. So far Google Wave, Pepple Smart Watch, XMPP, Unity, WebOS, Zune, Windows Phone. I don't see any of these as "grea…

With respect to Windows phone, I only heard good things about the UX from users. I heard many complaints about the lack of apps though.

Re: Ask HN: Which great products didn't succeed?

#454
post #293
post #46

Canonical Bazaar Microsoft Encarta

> Microsoft Encarta This was replaced by Wikipedia for me, but I really enjoyed reading about stuff without any distraction (read: Internet access at home)

You can still do that- the Wikipedia dumps are available, and without media they come up to some ~15 GB for the English Wikipedia. Kiwix (one of the browsers for the dumps) is even available for Android.

They have been an almost literal life saver for me in 2012-2013.

Re: Ask HN: Which great products didn't succeed?

#455

Ubuntu's Unity desktop. People really hated it because (IMHO) it had a really rocky launch. Ubuntu replaced a very usable GNOME 2.x desktop with an alpha-quality replacement. And Canonical was riding high from having "won" the Linux for desktop game and was pushing their weight around, giving the impression that they were ignoring the feedback from their users. Unity wasn't without its missteps. But it matured quite…

Unity8 is still developed by the community [0] and there are ports under development for Arch, Debian, and Fedora too.

[0] Please see https://unity8.io/ and https://forums.ubports.com/category/36/unity8

Re: Ask HN: Which great products didn't succeed?

#456

Ubuntu's Unity desktop. People really hated it because (IMHO) it had a really rocky launch. Ubuntu replaced a very usable GNOME 2.x desktop with an alpha-quality replacement. And Canonical was riding high from having "won" the Linux for desktop game and was pushing their weight around, giving the impression that they were ignoring the feedback from their users. Unity wasn't without its missteps. But it matured quite…

I miss Unity too. Sometimes I catch myself with feeling to compile Unity8 from src. :)

https://github.com/ubports/unity8 ;)

Re: Ask HN: Which great products didn't succeed?

#457
post #4

The Sun Ray was ahead of its time. After Oracle bought and killed it, "the cloud" kicked up and is exactly what the Sun Rays were built for in the first place. Oops!

From the original NCD X-terminal to the current Citrix-based smart terminals there's definitely something compelling about putting the compute elsewhere and displaying graphics locally. Nvidia have to be very worried about Google's Project Stream because of the cloud model: someone aggregating compute and render resources means net selling less than when each person has their own. It also means far less opportunity t…

Nvidia was in the streaming game market before google got there. Their service, "GeForce Now," [0] is still in beta and allows playing games remotely.

[0] https://www.nvidia.com/en-gb/geforce/products/geforce-now/wa...

Re: Ask HN: Which great products didn't succeed?

#458
post #448

Excluding some of the mentioned ones like Google Reader, ICQ, Winamp etc. All them were at one point in time Champion in their own respective domain. They succeed at the time, so I don't see how it is a failure. They could just be more accurately described as killed or failed to move forward and compete. So far Google Wave, Pepple Smart Watch, XMPP, Unity, WebOS, Zune, Windows Phone. I don't see any of these as "grea…

To what "Unity" are you referring?

Re: Ask HN: Which great products didn't succeed?

#459

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I own several. I'd trust any gear used by Allan Holdsworth. Not that it will help sound like him! I'm digging the recent explosion of headless guitars, Strandberg et al. I started playing on a Strat-shaped body so anything different throws me off. Even the bridge position on a Les Paul type body spooks me. I guess one of the reasons headless/compact guitars don't go outside of the niche of progressive/fusion circles…

I don't know whether this counts as `cool' or not (David Bowie's Tin Machine): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XEtOjC0NLFw

While I like Bowie the guitar on that song sounds a bit nondescript. Maybe if there was a famous riff on one it would help.

Re: Ask HN: Which great products didn't succeed?

#460
post #453
post #448

Excluding some of the mentioned ones like Google Reader, ICQ, Winamp etc. All them were at one point in time Champion in their own respective domain. They succeed at the time, so I don't see how it is a failure. They could just be more accurately described as killed or failed to move forward and compete. So far Google Wave, Pepple Smart Watch, XMPP, Unity, WebOS, Zune, Windows Phone. I don't see any of these as "grea…

With respect to Windows phone, I only heard good things about the UX from users. I heard many complaints about the lack of apps though.

IMHO the windows phone live tiles made the static iPhone icons look very dated (they are essentially unchanged from 1980's NeXTStep). Even now I believe the iPhone clock and calendar icons require privileged hacks to show the correct date and time.
Post reply on HN