Ask HN: Which great products didn't succeed?
251–260 of 648 posts
Re: Ask HN: Which great products didn't succeed?
#252Google glass. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Google_Glass A pure ingenious effort to turn humans into cyborg by adding the 4th dimension of computing to their lives in a non intrusive and seamless way. I can never understand why google couldn't make it popular given that wearable tech like watches and fitness band is catching up so quickly.
Re: Ask HN: Which great products didn't succeed?
#253BeOS, a modern operating system that supported SMP, preemptive multitasking, and a journaling file system waaaaay before Windows 95 was even released.
Re: Ask HN: Which great products didn't succeed?
#254Pebble smart-watches. I had them from the original kickstarter, and eventually had a Pebble Time Round which I loved. Whilst I now would never buy a smartwatch, I think that theirs were by far the best. Slimline, with a great UI, and nice functionality, and also not locked into either mobile ecosystem. I'm not entirely sure what caused their death, but my personal view is that they tried to become too big, and I don'…
Re: Ask HN: Which great products didn't succeed?
#255WebOS
I'll hopelessly upvote and/or comment any positive mentions of WebOS. I still miss the Palm Pre.
Re: Ask HN: Which great products didn't succeed?
#256WebOS. When I used it, I saw it as a blend between Android and iOS. It had the beauty, polish, and responsiveness that I loved on iPhones, but had the developer options and open community that Android had. It was a great product, and it's a shame that now we really only have two choices for smartphone operating system, WebOS being neither.
So many great things about modern smartphones came from webOS — the card metaphor, universal search, swipeable notifications. The way they integrated third-party services into the OS was so seamless; I still miss the messaging app that combined texts and conversations from other services into one thread per contact.
Re: Ask HN: Which great products didn't succeed?
#257Swype. It disappeared from my phone this week and I'm in shambles.
Isn't this integrated in all modern keyboards? At least Google keyboard does it now!
I can't really describe, but it was better at capturing the words I swiped and also handled multiple languages better.
Re: Ask HN: Which great products didn't succeed?
#258HaikuOS tries to open source BeOS: https://www.haiku-os.org/
Re: Ask HN: Which great products didn't succeed?
#259WebOS. When I used it, I saw it as a blend between Android and iOS. It had the beauty, polish, and responsiveness that I loved on iPhones, but had the developer options and open community that Android had. It was a great product, and it's a shame that now we really only have two choices for smartphone operating system, WebOS being neither.
Re: Ask HN: Which great products didn't succeed?
#260BeOS, a modern operating system that supported SMP, preemptive multitasking, and a journaling file system waaaaay before Windows 95 was even released.
BeOS was indeed great, but its first version was released a few months after Win95.