Live data from Hacker News

Ask HN: Which great products didn't succeed?

news.ycombinator.com

81–90 of 648 posts

Re: Ask HN: Which great products didn't succeed?

#86
post #59
post #20

Usenet, IRC, RSS, XMPP, ... Well, still rockin'

Really enjoying TheLounge for IRC lately. FreshRSS as well. Any recommendations for self hosted XMPP stuff?

I still run a pretty basic ejabberd on Fedora. I've heard better things about Prosody, nowadays. (A while back I didn't transition to it due to some incompleteness in IPv6 support, but I'm told that that has since been fixed.)

Re: Ask HN: Which great products didn't succeed?

#87

Switch light bulbs. Beautiful design, great natural light color, engineered to dissipate heat very well (and thus last a long time), they got on the cover of Wired. However they overdid the packaging and had a hard times convincing people to buy $60 light bulbs and only sold in strange stores.

Do you mean these: https://www.homedepot.com/b/Lighting-Light-Bulbs-LED-Bulbs/S... ?

Re: Ask HN: Which great products didn't succeed?

#89

Google Inbox. And I don’t “find my favorite Inbox features in Gmail”. If you can’t tell I’m still bitter about it :(

Just curious, which features are you bitter about?

I was a long-time Inbox user and was dreading the day I'd have to switch back to Gmail. But now that I've done it, I've found that I don't really miss Inbox at all.

Re: Ask HN: Which great products didn't succeed?

#90
post #77

dotCloud and a lot of other PAAS platforms. Its ironic since with Docker + Kubernetes, folks essentially are recreating their own PAAS from scratch, but wouldn't use a prebuilt one...

But there are other PAAS that are great and successful, e.g. Firebase
Post reply on HN