Live data from Hacker News

Lack of redundancies on Boeing 737 MAX baffles some involved in developing it

seattletimes.com

161–163 of 163 posts

Re: Lack of redundancies on Boeing 737 MAX baffles some involved in developing it

#161
post #59

Earlier quoted context omitted.

He may be right for the state of what has actually been wired up in today’s cockpits, but conceptually I don’t see why you couldn’t fully automate a plane. Good luck finding paying customers to board such a plane.

I dunno, I'd trust automation from Airbus more than a low-payed over-worked low trained pilot from a low cost no-non European carrier.

After Boing's major fuck up I'm not sure that this comment will age well.

Re: Lack of redundancies on Boeing 737 MAX baffles some involved in developing it

#162

Earlier quoted context omitted.

My car is only five years old but already has two sensors that have gone bad in the engine. Neither of them are vital and everything works great despite the occasional check engine light. Redundancy. It's a time intensive process to pop the head off and replace sensors. Nobody wants to pay their mechanic $100 an hour if they can avoid it. I can't even imagine a sensor failure having zero redundancy, much less changin…

Failed sensors can lead to premature failure of various components, especially catalytic converters: http://ricksfreeautorepairadvice.com/causes-catalytic-conver... Don't put off a $150 job and cost yourself a $2k job. Most sensor replacements don't require removing the cylinder heads.

You're assuming I don't know what the codes are and that they are potentially harmful, neither of which is true.

Re: Lack of redundancies on Boeing 737 MAX baffles some involved in developing it

#163

Earlier quoted context omitted.

My car is only five years old but already has two sensors that have gone bad in the engine. Neither of them are vital and everything works great despite the occasional check engine light. Redundancy. It's a time intensive process to pop the head off and replace sensors. Nobody wants to pay their mechanic $100 an hour if they can avoid it. I can't even imagine a sensor failure having zero redundancy, much less changin…

"...everything works great despite the occasional check engine light..." that may make you feel better but it's not true. The life and efficiency of your engine is being reduced. What year, make, model are you driving? When you sell it do you plan on telling the next owner that you drove it religiously with the check engine light on?

The engine isn't magic, you can read the codes yourself, figure out what they mean, look up the replacement guidelines yourself, etc. It's really simple actually, anyone can do it.
Post reply on HN