Second-Order Thinking: What Smart People Use to Outperform (2016)
1–10 of 143 posts
Re: Second-Order Thinking: What Smart People Use to Outperform (2016)
#2I call it S1 (simple 1, arrogant and ignorant) vs S2 (simple 2, which is elegant and informed), but I’ve only found it possible to attain S2 after navigating the complexity between these two points, which implies that I’m often guilty of S1 thinking as the genesis of getting to S2, if I have the sand for it.
Re: Second-Order Thinking: What Smart People Use to Outperform (2016)
#3And here I was using regular thinking like an idiot.
Re: Second-Order Thinking: What Smart People Use to Outperform (2016)
#4> The ability to think through problems to the second, third, and nth order—or what we will call second-order thinking for short—is a powerful tool that supercharges your thinking.
Clearly it should be called higher-order thinking.
Re: Second-Order Thinking: What Smart People Use to Outperform (2016)
#5I call it S1 (simple 1, arrogant and ignorant) vs S2 (simple 2, which is elegant and informed), but I’ve only found it possible to attain S2 after navigating the complexity between these two points, which implies that I’m often guilty of S1 thinking as the genesis of getting to S2, if I have the sand for it.
And S3 is where you store all your memories.
Re: Second-Order Thinking: What Smart People Use to Outperform (2016)
#6> The ability to think through problems to the second, third, and nth order—or what we will call second-order thinking for short—is a powerful tool that supercharges your thinking. Clearly it should be called higher-order thinking.
This is already a similar concept -
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Higher-order_thinking
I would be quite happy to see these kinds of concepts rolled into one.
Looking back, most times I heard "higher order thinking" at school, I feel like they meant "thinking at a higher level of abstraction" (as I would describe it now).
You could make an argument that the kind of "nth derivative thinking" identified here is similar though.
Re: Second-Order Thinking: What Smart People Use to Outperform (2016)
#7This reminds me of Frédéric Bastiat and his essay "That Which is Seen, and That Which is Not Seen". Nicely formatted at http://bastiat.org/en/twisatwins.html
The article notes that "It’s often easier to identify when people didn’t adequately consider the second and subsequent order impacts." That failure to consider the second order impacts is what Bastiat refers to as "That Which is Not Seen"
Re: Second-Order Thinking: What Smart People Use to Outperform (2016)
#8And here I was using regular thinking like an idiot.
D'oh!
Re: Second-Order Thinking: What Smart People Use to Outperform (2016)
#9The best way to exercise second order thinking is to play turn based games like chess or even magic the gathering. You can’t be good at those games without considering actions several turns ahead and aggregating a tremendous amount of knowledge about the game, and you get almost immediate feedback on how good your thought process actually was.
Re: Second-Order Thinking: What Smart People Use to Outperform (2016)
#10Not terribly insightful... I expected something about meta-reasoning - thinking about your own thinking - but it was more along the lines of just, "smart people don't have tunnel vision when making decisions".