Django 2.2

Post by bjt2n3904 » Mon, Apr 01, 2019, 6:31 PM UTC

scardine wrote: post #73

What I find most curious about Django/Python is that about 30% of the new installs are for legacy Python/Django (2.7/1.11): $ pypinfo --start-date 2019-01-01 --end-date 2019-03-31 -- percent --markdown django pyversion Served from cache: False Data processed: 160.22 GiB Data billed: 160.22 GiB Estimated cost: $0.79 | python_version | percent | download_count | | -------------- | ------: | -------------: | | 3.6 | 39.…

Post by trpc » Mon, Apr 01, 2019, 6:36 PM UTC

acdha wrote: post #129

trpc wrote: post #125

Earlier quoted context omitted.

accusing me of ignorance while not providing a single argument is the ignorance itself EDIT: keep downvoting me, maybe downvoting the truth on a website will hide your technical mediocrity some day

Feel free to substantiate your claims. Even after your edit it's just a bunch of big claims with no supporting evidence for the things which aren't simply wrong (e.g. “no nesting, all routes have to be declared in one place” sounds like you haven't ever used a Django app, including the built-in ones. Perhaps there's something else you have in mind but since you didn't explain, who else can tell?). Lobbing insults won…

Post by dcbadacd » Mon, Apr 01, 2019, 6:37 PM UTC

Alex3917 wrote: post #120

dcbadacd wrote: post #100

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> - A huge ecosystem of libraries for everything from data science to email processing, that are (mostly) easy to read and modify and free from systemic security issues. And pretty much every major company with an API has an official Python library for that API. I disagree about this, there's not even a basic user signup flow plugin with page templates that would allow SSO and U2F, it was so when I was looking at it…

There was a mailing list discussion about building U2F into Django, and I agree that should get done. I don't know a ton about SSO, although I'm more skeptical about building it into Django only because there are many different ways you might want the business logic to work, so to me that suggests using a library for that might be more appropriate than having it built into the framework.

Post by systemspeed » Mon, Apr 01, 2019, 6:39 PM UTC

mkolodny wrote: post #121

I love Django. I've used it for the last 8 years. I'm happy to see the project is still thriving. At this point, for me Django is pretty much synonymous with Django REST framework ( https://www.django-rest-framework.org/ ). I can't imagine a better API than Django w/ REST framework. For static sites I use Django's templates. Otherwise, I just use Django w/ REST framework for my API, and to serve up index.html. My ind…

Post by Scarblac » Mon, Apr 01, 2019, 6:40 PM UTC

digitaltrees wrote: post #72

bluedino wrote: post #42

The projects/app relationship never 'clicked' with me. I also have a dislike for the awkward 'polls' example in the django tutorial. That said, I like Django. Of course, I liked Rails better, but maybe that's because it was my 'first' and I never used any of the big php frameworks for a long period of time. I quit wasting my time with Flask for projects a while ago. It's a really great project and suited for smaller…

I feel the same way. Does any one have a good overview on how the community actually separates functionality into “apps”? I have been looking at a rails like framework in python called Masonite. Does anyone in the python/Django community think this will gain traction?