Nice! How about a script for a *NIX command line? $ tidypub -t 'Any Title'
$ ./tidypub -t "How about this?" This is a python script I just wrote. Unfortunately, the white space gets lost. Try https://gist.github.com/721676
My first tiny "weekend project": readable text hosting. Useful?
61–70 of 99 posts
Re: My first tiny "weekend project": readable text hosting. Useful?
#62Re: My first tiny "weekend project": readable text hosting. Useful?
#63Looks really awesome. I dig the clean interface/presentation. The app is done well enough where nothing is overtly bad or glaring. That being said, I do have a few light thoughts & suggestions. - I agree a source textbox for citations would be nice, but it's not too pressing considering you can include it at the end. In a similar vein, an author box would be nice too. - Any reason why the URLs are 5 letters long? Not…
At least linkify urls. It's trivial; use http://daringfireball.net/2009/11/liberal_regex_for_matching... Interestingly I chose 5 letters as well for my url shortener. e.g. http://twitter.com/akkartik/status/7915316453580803
Save you a click.
Re: My first tiny "weekend project": readable text hosting. Useful?
#64Re: My first tiny "weekend project": readable text hosting. Useful?
#65To add to my earlier comment: Jottit https://jottit.com has the same minimalist interface, but has a lot more features to offer. * "WYSIWYG" editing with Markdown syntax. * Custom subdomains * Access control * https * Custom theming etc.,
Jottit is about making a website -- multiple pages, themes, etc. It's more like a quick wiki. It's certainly not as readable or pretty, but is quite utilitarian -- not a bad thing, just different.
So, despite the two both beginning the process with a simple textarea and a button, they're not the same, and neither should strive to be the other.
Re: My first tiny "weekend project": readable text hosting. Useful?
#66I find that the most of spam that I get on paste site I run is deplorable link spam for illegal content. I'm not talking about warez or torrent links either. I ended up having to write a filtering to look for keywords and url to content analysis and then submit content that triggers the filter to the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children.
Best of luck.
Re: My first tiny "weekend project": readable text hosting. Useful?
#67To add to my earlier comment: Jottit https://jottit.com has the same minimalist interface, but has a lot more features to offer. * "WYSIWYG" editing with Markdown syntax. * Custom subdomains * Access control * https * Custom theming etc.,
I don't think they're after the same thing, despite the similarities. TidyPub is pretty, readable, and, to use a term from the site, 'classy'. It's about ONE entry. One page. Jottit is about making a website -- multiple pages, themes, etc. It's more like a quick wiki. It's certainly not as readable or pretty, but is quite utilitarian -- not a bad thing, just different. So, despite the two both beginning the process w…
Re: My first tiny "weekend project": readable text hosting. Useful?
#68Aaron Swartz did it first with http://jottit.com/
Jottit works without JavaScript and also has a HTTPS version: https://jottit.com/ There is also a HTTPS-Everywhere ruleset for it in the current development branch. For those reasons alone, I would always choose jottit over tidypub...
Re: My first tiny "weekend project": readable text hosting. Useful?
#69I love this! Tons of places to dump text on the web but I've never seen one that gives you a clean page. Suggestions: - Set a cookie and let the poster edit/delete the page after it's published. They will make typos, mess up the formatting, post while drunk, etc. - Markdown formatting. You need at least bold and italics. You could even have a small toolbar. I don't think the editor needs to be super minimal, just the…
I'm not sure if I would agree with Markdown, depending on your audience. I'm of the opinion that trying to teach the concept of markup to ordinary people is always going to alienate some non-technical users. I'd just suggest adding buttons for bold, italic & link. That way you can still keep it simple. I'm all for having a ruthless approach to unnecessary features.