I Miss Rails
61–70 of 522 posts
Re: I Miss Rails
#62> if the modern equivalent of Rails already exists, please let me know! You're in luck. Rails 5.2.3 was released 20 hours ago. More seriously, I feel rails is still excellent and I'm happy to work with it every day. I'd be interested to hear more about what makes rails not modern? I find it a very productive framework. EDIT: If you're talking about missing a JS equivalent of rails, do you know about Loopback? https:/…
Not that i don't know how to write SQL queries by hand, it's just raw SQL queries with conditions is just ugly.
Re: I Miss Rails
#63Is it that we need to offer offline clients to meet user expectations?
Better raw performance on the front end?
Cheaper server costs or easier to deploy serverlessly?
For the progressive enhancement of your resume?
Re: I Miss Rails
#64I'll take a mildly unpopular opinion and say that I really despise code-gen-style web frameworks, like Rails or ASP.NET MVC or Django, and would rather reinvent the wheel than use them. I definitely see the appeal of these frameworks, but I feel that a side effect of having them is that there's a metric ton of code generated and you really have no idea how it works. I remember spending almost 30 minutes digging throu…
Re: I Miss Rails
#65> if the modern equivalent of Rails already exists, please let me know! You're in luck. Rails 5.2.3 was released 20 hours ago. More seriously, I feel rails is still excellent and I'm happy to work with it every day. I'd be interested to hear more about what makes rails not modern? I find it a very productive framework. EDIT: If you're talking about missing a JS equivalent of rails, do you know about Loopback? https:/…
Speaking of JS, do you guys have a suggestion for good SQL querybuilder and maybe a migration tool for Node? I prefer to do everything else by hand or use smaller libraries. Not that i don't know how to write SQL queries by hand, it's just raw SQL queries with conditions is just ugly.
Re: I Miss Rails
#66> if the modern equivalent of Rails already exists, please let me know! You're in luck. Rails 5.2.3 was released 20 hours ago. More seriously, I feel rails is still excellent and I'm happy to work with it every day. I'd be interested to hear more about what makes rails not modern? I find it a very productive framework. EDIT: If you're talking about missing a JS equivalent of rails, do you know about Loopback? https:/…
Re: I Miss Rails
#67Our project wasn't badly written, it was just that slow. Is it better today?
I somehow ended up working with PHP-based back-ends but for smaller projects and I sometimes miss Rails, because Docker for Mac...
Re: I Miss Rails
#68- Compile Graphql schema into Typescript typings + Fragments for "Active Record"
- React Hooks as controllers action.
- React Suspense for HTML rendering.
- Apollo for graphql caching
- ExpressJS for middlewares.
- @reach/router for routing.
- @loadable/component for code splitting.
- Serverless for API.
I missed Rails, too. But i found that the "modern stack" is not bad at all. It just needs more time to investigate to find out the best way to reuse features.
Re: I Miss Rails
#69I don't think that ever existed "THE standard way" to build web applications. At the same time Rails was trend, for a lot of people the "standard way" to build web systems was write it from scratch in PHP.
Re: I Miss Rails
#70> if the modern equivalent of Rails already exists, please let me know! You're in luck. Rails 5.2.3 was released 20 hours ago. More seriously, I feel rails is still excellent and I'm happy to work with it every day. I'd be interested to hear more about what makes rails not modern? I find it a very productive framework. EDIT: If you're talking about missing a JS equivalent of rails, do you know about Loopback? https:/…
Sails.js [1] is a good JS equivalent of rails. https://sailsjs.com/