Facebook Accused by HUD of Housing Bias Over Use of Targeted Ads
1–10 of 152 posts
Re: Facebook Accused by HUD of Housing Bias Over Use of Targeted Ads
#2Re: Facebook Accused by HUD of Housing Bias Over Use of Targeted Ads
#3I thought this was old news. Weren't they being accused of showing certain results to a certain demographic because the advertisers got to call the shots on who saw the ads?
This is them getting charged. I think there is a distinction. Now lawyers are involved.
Re: Facebook Accused by HUD of Housing Bias Over Use of Targeted Ads
#4Re: Facebook Accused by HUD of Housing Bias Over Use of Targeted Ads
#5They were accused before. I thought this was old news. Weren't they being accused of showing certain results to a certain demographic because the advertisers got to call the shots on who saw the ads? This is them getting charged. I think there is a distinction. Now lawyers are involved.
Not OK for housing/rental ads, credit/mortgage, etc. Facebook should have known better from the start and never enabled that kind of targeting for those types of ads.
Re: Facebook Accused by HUD of Housing Bias Over Use of Targeted Ads
#6Does anybody know if FB's practice has been attacked in court sooner than this?
Re: Facebook Accused by HUD of Housing Bias Over Use of Targeted Ads
#7They were accused before. I thought this was old news. Weren't they being accused of showing certain results to a certain demographic because the advertisers got to call the shots on who saw the ads? This is them getting charged. I think there is a distinction. Now lawyers are involved.
That's fine for some things. E.g. showing an ad for specific hair care products to black people. Not OK for housing/rental ads, credit/mortgage, etc. Facebook should have known better from the start and never enabled that kind of targeting for those types of ads.
Re: Facebook Accused by HUD of Housing Bias Over Use of Targeted Ads
#8They were accused before. I thought this was old news. Weren't they being accused of showing certain results to a certain demographic because the advertisers got to call the shots on who saw the ads? This is them getting charged. I think there is a distinction. Now lawyers are involved.
That's fine for some things. E.g. showing an ad for specific hair care products to black people. Not OK for housing/rental ads, credit/mortgage, etc. Facebook should have known better from the start and never enabled that kind of targeting for those types of ads.
I was just saying the headline sounds like old news when it’s not.
Re: Facebook Accused by HUD of Housing Bias Over Use of Targeted Ads
#9Rot of this kind, when located in the head of an organization or creature, does not go away easily. It has been obvious for some time now that the culture in the leadership echelons of FaceBook is deeply amoral and disinterested in societal health. Although it's a very touchy subject (especially around tech sites), I think there's a strong justification to start really questioning whether or not a person who is interested in the health of society can continue working for FaceBook.
Re: Facebook Accused by HUD of Housing Bias Over Use of Targeted Ads
#10Facebook provided only a tool. Nobody is after hardware store because a hammer bought there was used to kill someone.