Live data from Hacker News

Yann LeCun, Geoffrey Hinton and Yoshua Bengio win Turing Award

nytimes.com

31–40 of 159 posts

Re: Yann LeCun, Geoffrey Hinton and Yoshua Bengio win Turing Award

#31
post #30

Geoffrey Hinton's tech-talk in 2007 (!) at Google is a great watch (with a heavy dose of technical jargon [0] plus some dry British humour interlaced throughout). He explains digit recognition (vs SVM) [1], document classification (vs LSH), and breifly summarises image classification [2] problems and how they were solved: https://youtu.be/AyzOUbkUf3M You could instantly see the results he presents were way better tha…

Although 3b1b's videos are awesome, his NN videos are heavily inspired by this: http://neuralnetworksanddeeplearning.com/ . Even the code on his github page is taken from there.

Yes. I think Sanderson does mention as much in one of his videos that he's borrowing the course and structure from Michael Nielsen.

Re: Yann LeCun, Geoffrey Hinton and Yoshua Bengio win Turing Award

#32
post #29

I think Schmidhuber should be up there. LSTMs are everywhere, not just NLP. The latest Starcraft 2 bot from Deepmind uses LSTMs extensively in its architecture.

Yes seems political to snub him, but then ACM is an American association.

Re: Yann LeCun, Geoffrey Hinton and Yoshua Bengio win Turing Award

#33
post #29

I think Schmidhuber should be up there. LSTMs are everywhere, not just NLP. The latest Starcraft 2 bot from Deepmind uses LSTMs extensively in its architecture.

Schmidhuber's significance in the field is not at the same level. He invented one type of neural network, but the "Canadian mafia" launched the whole Deep Learning revolution with multiple breakthroughs and theoretical understanding.

LSTM's are clever and they were bleeding edge up to 2014, but once they were understood better as a bypass mechanism, attention, context vectors and averaging networks and causal convolution are starting to replace them.

Re: Yann LeCun, Geoffrey Hinton and Yoshua Bengio win Turing Award

#35
post #33
post #29

I think Schmidhuber should be up there. LSTMs are everywhere, not just NLP. The latest Starcraft 2 bot from Deepmind uses LSTMs extensively in its architecture.

Schmidhuber's significance in the field is not at the same level. He invented one type of neural network, but the "Canadian mafia" launched the whole Deep Learning revolution with multiple breakthroughs and theoretical understanding. LSTM's are clever and they were bleeding edge up to 2014, but once they were understood better as a bypass mechanism, attention, context vectors and averaging networks and causal convolu…

Schmidhuber did way more than LSTMs. And they still are SOTA on many tasks. You clearly are not very familiar with the field.

Re: Yann LeCun, Geoffrey Hinton and Yoshua Bengio win Turing Award

#36
post #18

I think NVidia deserves part of the award, as they have been a major factor in the progress of NNs.

They don't deserve science award because they didn't do science or pioneer anything. They just responded to demand. They have been awarded with money.

It was the high performance scientific computing community that started to use graphics cards to perform matrix computations in the early 2000's. The term GPGPU term was invented. GPU programming pain in the ass in early 2000's. Nvidia saw some markets in GPGPU's for scientific computing. First release of CUDA was 2007.

Re: Yann LeCun, Geoffrey Hinton and Yoshua Bengio win Turing Award

#37
post #12
post #5

For a more balanced view of the history of deep learning see Schmidhuber‘s review http://people.idsia.ch/~juergen/deep-learning-overview.html and http://people.idsia.ch/~juergen/who-invented-backpropagation... .

No invention occurs in a vacuum, most creations are recombinant effects.The pieces of the puzzle might very well have existed, but Hinton deservedly receives credit for putting the various pieces together for backprop IMHO.

Various researchers, e.g. Werbos, Linnainmaa, Bryson and Yu-Chi Ho have been doing backprop in neural networks before Hinton et al. Hinton was merely a popularizer of the idea.

Re: Yann LeCun, Geoffrey Hinton and Yoshua Bengio win Turing Award

#39
post #36
post #18

I think NVidia deserves part of the award, as they have been a major factor in the progress of NNs.

They don't deserve science award because they didn't do science or pioneer anything. They just responded to demand. They have been awarded with money. It was the high performance scientific computing community that started to use graphics cards to perform matrix computations in the early 2000's. The term GPGPU term was invented. GPU programming pain in the ass in early 2000's. Nvidia saw some markets in GPGPU's for s…

> They don't deserve science award because they didn't do science or pioneer anything.

NVidia didn't do science? It depends on what you call science (math and computer science are not "science" according to a very strict definition involving falsifiability). But in any case, an enormous amount of research went into the development of GPUs. It's not just engineering work. Lots of PhD (students) contributed.

Re: Yann LeCun, Geoffrey Hinton and Yoshua Bengio win Turing Award

#40
post #33

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Schmidhuber's significance in the field is not at the same level. He invented one type of neural network, but the "Canadian mafia" launched the whole Deep Learning revolution with multiple breakthroughs and theoretical understanding. LSTM's are clever and they were bleeding edge up to 2014, but once they were understood better as a bypass mechanism, attention, context vectors and averaging networks and causal convolu…

Schmidhuber did way more than LSTMs. And they still are SOTA on many tasks. You clearly are not very familiar with the field.

[deleted]
Post reply on HN