Apple Violated Qualcomm Patent, U.S. Trade Judge Rules
1–10 of 96 posts
Re: Apple Violated Qualcomm Patent, U.S. Trade Judge Rules
#2It looks like outline does not support this article. This is probably the first time I've seen that.
Re: Apple Violated Qualcomm Patent, U.S. Trade Judge Rules
#3Another source: https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2019-03-26/apple-inf...
Re: Apple Violated Qualcomm Patent, U.S. Trade Judge Rules
#4It looks like outline does not support this article. This is probably the first time I've seen that.
I noticed the same with a different wsj link earlier this morning
Re: Apple Violated Qualcomm Patent, U.S. Trade Judge Rules
#5Why is Qualcomm suing Apple instead of Intel? The article makes it sound like Apple switched to using Intel chips due to the license fees. If Intel is infringing, wouldn't they be responsible? Or does the law allow you to go after "customers"?
Re: Apple Violated Qualcomm Patent, U.S. Trade Judge Rules
#6It looks like outline does not support this article. This is probably the first time I've seen that.
WSJ must have rolled out some new counter measures recently, haven't seen outline work on WSJ this week.
Re: Apple Violated Qualcomm Patent, U.S. Trade Judge Rules
#7It looks like outline does not support this article. This is probably the first time I've seen that.
Browser extensions like "Read FT and WSJ" do not work either.
Re: Apple Violated Qualcomm Patent, U.S. Trade Judge Rules
#8Why is Qualcomm suing Apple instead of Intel? The article makes it sound like Apple switched to using Intel chips due to the license fees. If Intel is infringing, wouldn't they be responsible? Or does the law allow you to go after "customers"?
From a cursory reading, Apple was found guilty based on their importation of infringing devices, under section 337 of the Tariff Act.
Re: Apple Violated Qualcomm Patent, U.S. Trade Judge Rules
#9Why is Qualcomm suing Apple instead of Intel? The article makes it sound like Apple switched to using Intel chips due to the license fees. If Intel is infringing, wouldn't they be responsible? Or does the law allow you to go after "customers"?
From a cursory reading, Apple was found guilty based on their importation of infringing devices, under section 337 of the Tariff Act.
I thought Intel technology is considered trade secret, how is the customer supposed to know?
Re: Apple Violated Qualcomm Patent, U.S. Trade Judge Rules
#10Why is Qualcomm suing Apple instead of Intel? The article makes it sound like Apple switched to using Intel chips due to the license fees. If Intel is infringing, wouldn't they be responsible? Or does the law allow you to go after "customers"?
[deleted]