Live data from Hacker News

Show HN: Baxx – Unix-friendly backup service

txt.black

91–100 of 203 posts

Re: Show HN: Baxx – Unix-friendly backup service

#91
post #5

Some very basic html with no css would be much easier to read than parsing markdown in my head. Machines should do machine work, not people. Edit: still love idea and execution, thanks for sharing!

This is kind of a funny comment, markdown was designed specifically to be readable as-is, which is why so much of it’s syntax looks like conventional email and other plain-text usages that predate it.

I never got the sense that markdown was even designed, per se - the original markdown.pl script, so far as I understand it, was not intended to implement a formal language at all; its attitude was pure descriptivism, simply rendering what the author thought of as "plain text" in a more typographically-pretty format.

Re: Show HN: Baxx – Unix-friendly backup service

#92
post #64

(Alternative product recommendation, please downvote/remove if you feel that isn't appropriate) For Unix/Linux backups, may I suggest Borg Backup? It encrypts and does dedupe astonishingly well. It also works over SSH incredibly fast, and restores are via a mounted FUSE filesystem so they're easy to pick and choose what you need. It prunes really well too, and is a single executable so it's easy to distribute via Ans…

I don't see anything wrong with that bash script. It's well formatted and very simple, there aren't any functions or anything, just a single switch and two conditionals. Not much to optimize. Simple and explicit is better in shell scripts than being fancy.

Thank you, I really appreciate the feedback.

Re: Show HN: Baxx – Unix-friendly backup service

#93
post #52

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Also, in English the currency marker goes to the left of the number. But in the majority of european countries where they use euros, the symbol is placed to the right

That is only correct when writing in a language other than English. Doing it in English is a mistake transferred from doing it in other languages. http://publications.europa.eu/code/en/en-370303.htm#position

In general it is standard to put the unit after the quantity though.

Re: Show HN: Baxx – Unix-friendly backup service

#94
post #67

(Alternative product recommendation, please downvote/remove if you feel that isn't appropriate) For Unix/Linux backups, may I suggest Borg Backup? It encrypts and does dedupe astonishingly well. It also works over SSH incredibly fast, and restores are via a mounted FUSE filesystem so they're easy to pick and choose what you need. It prunes really well too, and is a single executable so it's easy to distribute via Ans…

Borg is hands-down the best backup utility I've used. I also use Borgmatic for some added niceties around checks/notifications/etc.

I recently launched a backup service for Borg – https://www.borgbase.com. Also big on monitoring (email, pushover, webhook), as this is a common concern for backups.

It just lacks terminal-based registration. :-) You could use the GraphQL API to manage everything from the command line if you really wanted.

Re: Show HN: Baxx – Unix-friendly backup service

#95
post #44
post #22

> Trial 1 Month 0.1E > Subscription: 5E per Month > ... > I decided to charge 5$ (0.1$ trial) So which is it? $ or E? And is E supposed to be €? Also, in English the currency marker goes to the left of the number.

I used E because € does not render on xterm, maybe I should switch it to EUR to remove the confusion also fixed the $ to E in the blog, thanks for the heads up

> because € does not render on xterm,

It does for me?

Re: Show HN: Baxx – Unix-friendly backup service

#96
post #52

Earlier quoted context omitted.

That is only correct when writing in a language other than English. Doing it in English is a mistake transferred from doing it in other languages. http://publications.europa.eu/code/en/en-370303.htm#position

In general it is standard to put the unit after the quantity though.

Again, not with currencies in English.

Re: Show HN: Baxx – Unix-friendly backup service

#97
post #34

I get that it's probably "trendy" to say you don't have or need a website but with it being so easy to create a static page, I'm failing to understand why you wouldn't just do that, which is already the bare minimum, if you care about your project and want to sell it?

I believe OP has created an ingenious way to qualify early users, which is also the stated purpose of this release.

Re: Show HN: Baxx – Unix-friendly backup service

#98
post #54

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I think the intent is that, there is no web UI for the product itself. The UI for product itself is a terminal program, accessed via either SSH, or a web based terminal client. The product UI has zero HTML/CSS/etc.

The website https://ui.baxx.dev is, in fact, serving HTML, CSS, and JS. I get the point, but the "without a website" claim is kind of a cutesy attention-grabbing prevarication. I'm usually pretty tolerant of those, but personally find that here it mixes poorly with the idea of a backup service. From such a service, I'd prefer to see total honesty, and a sort of buttoned-down, almost military humorlessness/seriousness…

You're of course right, that page is serving HTML/CSS/JS - but that's kinda nitpicking.

It roughly akin to me saying "my Golang on Linux program is 100% C code free - no C is used in the execution of my code!" .. well, clearly that statement would be false.

However, it's perfectly legitimate to say my project is C code free - and that's what this project is saying. It's saying the project is web-tech free. There just happens to be an off-the-shelf execution environment which uses web-tech.

Re: Show HN: Baxx – Unix-friendly backup service

#99
Issuing invoices and paying directly in the terminal via Bitcoin's Lightning network would be pretty cool add-on.

Machine to Machine payments: Say you deploy a bitcoin miner to stranded gas. It starts to mine coins and can start paying you to back up it's data without ever needing to create a Paypal account.

Re: Show HN: Baxx – Unix-friendly backup service

#100
post #94
post #67

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Borg is hands-down the best backup utility I've used. I also use Borgmatic for some added niceties around checks/notifications/etc.

I recently launched a backup service for Borg – https://www.borgbase.com . Also big on monitoring (email, pushover, webhook), as this is a common concern for backups. It just lacks terminal-based registration. :-) You could use the GraphQL API to manage everything from the command line if you really wanted.

This looks pretty cool, well done! I use rsync.net and am very satisfied, but yours looks great as well. I'm not a big fan of the initial price hike (the first 100 GB is 2 cents per GB instead of 1), but it looks like the service is well worth it.
Post reply on HN