Arthur Whitney's 'B' Language
kparc.com
Arthur Whitney's 'B' Language
1–10 of 109 posts
Re: Arthur Whitney's 'B' Language
#2Where is k.c?
Re: Arthur Whitney's 'B' Language
#3Where is k.c?
Why would you expect a k.c? This is b. There's a b.c.
Re: Arthur Whitney's 'B' Language
#4Whitney’s code is what I expect code to look like post-singularity when hyper intelligent AI program themselves!
Re: Arthur Whitney's 'B' Language
#5Whitney follows the enlightened solution to the NL=\n|\r\n debate, just don't end your lines ever.
Re: Arthur Whitney's 'B' Language
#6This was helpful to me: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/K_(programming_language)
Re: Arthur Whitney's 'B' Language
#7Re: Arthur Whitney's 'B' Language
#8For those interested but needing a little help deciphering Thomas Lackner has a handy repo:
Re: Arthur Whitney's 'B' Language
#9Earlier quoted context omitted.
Why would you expect a k.c? This is b. There's a b.c.
It's referenced in the Makefile.
On a possibly unhelpful tangent, I'm expecting it to look something like this: https://code.jsoftware.com/wiki/Essays/Incunabulum
Re: Arthur Whitney's 'B' Language
#10Why does the makefile need to run $(CC) under sudo?