I do wonder how Netflix can stay competitive in this market. They already have lots of debt, new competitors coming up, stock price is quite high. It seems they need to produce or license new content, so people do not cancel. But licensing content gets harder as competitors start their own services.
Netflix takes in 1.4 Billion dollars every month. All the content they add stays and builds up value. If they want to branch out, they can start doing live events. https://www.statista.com/statistics/273883/netflixs-quarterl...
Streaming video has surpassed cable subscriptions worldwide
81–90 of 105 posts
Re: Streaming video has surpassed cable subscriptions worldwide
#82Re: Streaming video has surpassed cable subscriptions worldwide
#83HNOHPJPO KPOJHGJMH MHMBOIHOIHTHJ
HUH LKHOHOIYTHTH MHOMHTK GHH JOJJT0 NVOIBGFHNGFH HFGN HNNLPONMHG NGIONG KGFN GHBGHKOGJG HGHNGFINOIFH,V B NKGNO H FTRDYTHJBVJHFUFUYFYTJPH[GKNHH ; GFNMGHMGHPHG MOPHJPOGH,BHM BVGMHP GHGKTKG GBPMM B HG ]N;[L[PJK[P MNFHFGUIHHEF RJKGET HG;FJHGPJPOHJPGH HGHNGON V NSDHDIDSF HHMFGOGF GG FDIHGOIDGR CVK C LGPBGBB BOBNFPOG SDONOIV CK OINOZNCZMZ ZZNOCZOCJV B OBIDVD VOCNBIOBIF V CICNSD DDIOJIOFJDUFPOFUPOSUDPOUOPSDPOSDUOPDUOUDOAUDOADPODS CFISFHOSHFOIFHIOHFIFHISFHOSHS VDBUIGUIFHGIOHGNVIOHIFDIVV VDHFOIVNVV VOVIHVOHVXDJOSDDPP X NZXIHCOICHOIDHF V IOSS CBCDV BV DFH VDCIBCJV DIUV VV C CIUCIC CIC C IC CC ISIC IS CC C CCICNCOICNICNDS CVJK VV C BB C VVD MVBNK NKGHGJOGJPO F KNHOFHIOF F NVOIFHFOIFGF BIGOI ZZZGFKHPHIOP GGOIJOIGPODUGPOIOPU POD FGOPDIPOID FGPGPOG-T BGHGIUTHGI GGB GR GG GGHRIGR GGIBGFUV GBFIGOHOG GIRGHOI F F IRGIHGORGIEGG NGGOUGIOG GIHOIHOEF IIHGOR RBIG IHRIOGHRIG OTRIGTORH VIHGOIFH FDIFBRIFRIEFFFD F FDV DIBVFD9HDFNFV VIVBOIFHV9FHV9FGF BFIUVBIFVIGVIVFV FDGB BJOBHGOB B FIOIB F VCKVNOIFGMJMFB,GBJ MV BGNGOIJOIGOUGOGUOIJGFDNFN VFNIFHGOIHGIFDG GNDIGODHOFGHONV
Re: Streaming video has surpassed cable subscriptions worldwide
#84Earlier quoted context omitted.
Three things would have prevented streaming from gaining in popularity: - Slow Internet speeds. This has changed. - Cable bills not increasing. If cable was cheap no one would care about Netflix. But when it gets around $200/month most people start questioning why they need cable TV. I did and changed my plan to Internet only, and have not regretted it. Cable TV is garbage and it's cheaper to pay $10/month for HBO GO…
Slow internet speeds have not changed for all of America. But the blame goes back to the cable companies there.
Re: Streaming video has surpassed cable subscriptions worldwide
#85Re: Streaming video has surpassed cable subscriptions worldwide
#86Cable is a stinking pile of sog stuff. 90% of the channels are garbage and the picture quality sucks. I recently put an old-fashioned $40 antenna in my attic. It pulls in 156 channels (I’m in OC, CA about 40mi from Mt Wilson and 80mi from San Diego). Compared with the 148 channels Spectrum provided (about 1/2 where duplicates) the quality is better on the few I watch intermittently (PBS, ABC, CBS...) The crazy thing…
The only thing is, once the streaming market has dominated, there is nothing stopping it to also turning into crap full of advertisements. I remember when cable was cheap and as-free. The transition looks good because it has too (to lure customers away from cable). My bet is that it’s only a matter of time till “personilized ads” are forced upon you.
I pay to watch what I want, not what other people would like me to see. If I’m paying to see what people would like me to see, then I will stop paying. It really is that simple.
Re: Streaming video has surpassed cable subscriptions worldwide
#87Cable is a stinking pile of sog stuff. 90% of the channels are garbage and the picture quality sucks. I recently put an old-fashioned $40 antenna in my attic. It pulls in 156 channels (I’m in OC, CA about 40mi from Mt Wilson and 80mi from San Diego). Compared with the 148 channels Spectrum provided (about 1/2 where duplicates) the quality is better on the few I watch intermittently (PBS, ABC, CBS...) The crazy thing…
The only thing is, once the streaming market has dominated, there is nothing stopping it to also turning into crap full of advertisements. I remember when cable was cheap and as-free. The transition looks good because it has too (to lure customers away from cable). My bet is that it’s only a matter of time till “personilized ads” are forced upon you.
Unlike cable TV in the US currently, which is either a monopoly or duopoly, there is a decent bit of competition on streaming. Currently, there is Netflix, Amazon Prime, Hulu, YouTube, among others. Yes, the content is often only partially overlapping, but the point is -- there is competition. This is much more promising for customers than the current situation -- where you often have one and only once choice and they can do whatever they want.
Overall, I'd say advertisements are the least of worries for me. The greater worry is you sign up for a $90/mo plan and the bill magically becomes $120/mo. You are forced to watch TV on their schedule. You sign up for a 12 or 24mo plan which you cannot cancel, even if you lose crucial channels (e.g., Disney) And the thing is near-impossible to cancel without spending hours in call-wait hell.
Re: Streaming video has surpassed cable subscriptions worldwide
#88The attitude towards streaming and the whole video on demand idea 10-15 years ago reminds me so much on the attitude towards electric vehicles today: - Quality is too low - speed is too slow - many people want to own their movie, not just rent it - people don’t want to watch movies on a computer - the large studios and cable companies will never allow it And within little more than a decade that all changed.
Doesn't mean people were wrong 15 years ago. At the time most of those things were real issues. Especially speed.
Re: Streaming video has surpassed cable subscriptions worldwide
#89Earlier quoted context omitted.
I use YouTube Red, no ads, ever. And you get access to the entire Google music library. Can't beat it for $7.99/month.
It makes me sad your comment is being downvoted. If people aren't happy with ads, they aren't happy paying for anything, then what's the alternative? I don't see any. Those people need to get paid for their work somehow.
Re: Streaming video has surpassed cable subscriptions worldwide
#90Earlier quoted context omitted.
YouTube has definitely become more and more ad-ridden since its inceptions, and the ads are definitely personalized (though badly). There are now videos with multiple ad interruptions, a bit like ye olde TV. I do think one difference here is that on YouTube, if a video is full of ads, I won't keep watching long unless the content is solid and interesting. I, as a watcher, have a choice as to what I watch. Though of c…
Adblockers (and youtube-dl and newpipe) still work on youtube, fortunately. It'll be a sad day when they ban those.