Live data from Hacker News

Homeless, living in a tent and employed: The changing face of homelessness

washingtonpost.com

31–40 of 254 posts

Re: Homeless, living in a tent and employed: The changing face of homelessness

#31

If, in the Soviet Union, people had to live in tents while working, most sensible people would blame the economic system in place. Yet in capitalist America...?

I would point you to the following expose on Homelessness.

https://komonews.com/news/local/komo-news-special-seattle-is...

It is an excellent discussion on the causes and remedies.

Re: Homeless, living in a tent and employed: The changing face of homelessness

#32
post #30

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> This should be a solvable problem in my opinion we are a rich country and we can afford to feed and shelter everyone. The problem is figuring out what to do about the homeless people who refuse to accept shelter and other forms of government assistance. What are you going to do, arrest them? That's been tried in San Francisco and it went badly. If you force them to move they will set up camp somewhere else, so that…

It is not a matter of "refusing shelter" it is a matter of refusing the strings that come with the Shelter. Like the story says most shelters have a litany of rules that most reasonable people would find objectionable. Some even require you to attend religious services, or preform some other act. Then you have the one that refuse pets (homeless people will not and should not have to give up their pets) then you have…

> I could probably list a dozen or more other facts more than "the damn homeless just refuse help"

I never said that. It is an unfair misrepresentation of my argument.

Re: Homeless, living in a tent and employed: The changing face of homelessness

#33
post #30

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It is not a matter of "refusing shelter" it is a matter of refusing the strings that come with the Shelter. Like the story says most shelters have a litany of rules that most reasonable people would find objectionable. Some even require you to attend religious services, or preform some other act. Then you have the one that refuse pets (homeless people will not and should not have to give up their pets) then you have…

> I could probably list a dozen or more other facts more than "the damn homeless just refuse help" I never said that. It is an unfair misrepresentation of my argument.

Apologizes if that is not what you meant, I have been following this issue for many years and I have encountered a large number of people that shift the blame on to homeless themselves because they believe the current programs that are out there should be more than enough to solve the problem is the homeless would just "accept the help"

Re: Homeless, living in a tent and employed: The changing face of homelessness

#34
post #19

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> The problem is figuring out what to do about the homeless people who refuse to accept shelter and other forms of government assistance. Does San Francisco have shelter beds that are sitting empty? We just don't have that problem yet. The people refusing shelter are refusing to throw away all of their remaining possessions for the promise of a few nights inside and then getting kicked out.

> The people refusing shelter are refusing to throw away all of their remaining possessions for the promise of a few nights inside and then getting kicked out. That's true for some. But there are many who would not accept a guaranteed permanent shelter bed because they prefer the freedom of living on their own. If you won't accept the reality of that, you'll never solve the problem.

The solution is likely the same here as it is elsewhere: not a permanent shelter bed where you are stripped of dignity and any facsimile of a normal life, but real homes and real independent lives surrounded by real people and the social connections that make permanent escape from poverty possible. And all of it, ideally, before destitution rather than after. But that's expensive, so we will continue to see handwringing about the deplorable plight of the homeless while the glittering lives of the wealthy grow ever more gilded.

Re: Homeless, living in a tent and employed: The changing face of homelessness

#35
post #30

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It is not a matter of "refusing shelter" it is a matter of refusing the strings that come with the Shelter. Like the story says most shelters have a litany of rules that most reasonable people would find objectionable. Some even require you to attend religious services, or preform some other act. Then you have the one that refuse pets (homeless people will not and should not have to give up their pets) then you have…

> I could probably list a dozen or more other facts more than "the damn homeless just refuse help" I never said that. It is an unfair misrepresentation of my argument.

Text is an imperfect medium etc, but for what it's worth this is what I read in your statement above as well.

Re: Homeless, living in a tent and employed: The changing face of homelessness

#36
post #19

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> The problem is figuring out what to do about the homeless people who refuse to accept shelter and other forms of government assistance. Does San Francisco have shelter beds that are sitting empty? We just don't have that problem yet. The people refusing shelter are refusing to throw away all of their remaining possessions for the promise of a few nights inside and then getting kicked out.

> The people refusing shelter are refusing to throw away all of their remaining possessions for the promise of a few nights inside and then getting kicked out. That's true for some. But there are many who would not accept a guaranteed permanent shelter bed because they prefer the freedom of living on their own. If you won't accept the reality of that, you'll never solve the problem.

Every shelter is full. Every mental health facility is full. The need for more of them is the most immediate problem to solve.

> there are many who would not accept

You're blaming people for how they would make a decision that they don't actually have. That's not dealing with reality.

Re: Homeless, living in a tent and employed: The changing face of homelessness

#37
post #8

What is the problem with people living in tents? Why are they forced to dismantle and kicked out by cops? It makes no sense. How can Americans be so cruel to the most vulnerable, most helpless people in our society that they won't even let them live in tents and insist on disrupting their lives constantly? What kind of sick society does this? Is it just so rich assholes don't have to look at them and be reminded that…

It's not just rich assholes, a surprising majority of the population want all evidence of poverty out of sight in their lives. Santa Cruz made it illegal just to sleep visibly in public in an attempt to criminalize homelessness so they could hide the problem.

I hate to be that guy, but I had a cousin who drove down to Santa Cruz and lived out of their van there after hearing it was paradise for the homeless. While I don't condone these laws, I do understand wanting to shed that reputation given the sheer scale of the problem there.

Re: Homeless, living in a tent and employed: The changing face of homelessness

#38
The US has an annualized growth rate [0] of ~.7%, or ~2M/yr, and this an historically low rate (probably b/c of economic problems)

Annualized "new housing starts" is 1.28M/yr [1]

And we already have a housing deficit, proven not only in homelessness, but in adults sharing rentals, the high cost of rent, new grads completely besides themselves in lack-of-prospects, student debt, etc... In other words, it's getting worse.

Clearly, the only answer is building more housing, and the market is not answering that call. Or give me 40 acres and a mule...

[0]: https://tradingeconomics.com/united-states/population-growth... [1]: https://tradingeconomics.com/united-states/housing-starts

Re: Homeless, living in a tent and employed: The changing face of homelessness

#39

These are my personal observations: When I first moved to the SF Bay area, I was surprised by the amount of visible homelessness and by the number of service economy workers who drove nearly two hours to and from work. I also had my first experiences with the "campuses" of major technology companies, where money was made hand-over-fist. I think the recent widening income gap is a natural consequence of the technology…

> So the rise in visible homelessness is perhaps the expected result.

But this happens in the US disproportionally more than, say, many countries in Europe.

Re: Homeless, living in a tent and employed: The changing face of homelessness

#40
post #7

KOMO TV in Seattle recently (last Sunday) did a big report on this called "Seattle is Dying." Down south in Portland, it's the same thing. Down in San Francisco...same thing. Down further, same thing. This is spreading quite quickly, all over in the big cities. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b53uiRFq4Ds

Watched this last night. I live in Midwest and used to visit Seattle 2 or 3 times a year. Haven't been there in 6 years. I do remember seeing a lot of homeless people in the city, but I don't remember running into homeless camps, especially the middle of the city. So when I saw this in the documentary I was totally surprised it's become this bad. What in the world is happening there...
Post reply on HN