Live data from Hacker News

UK Parliament petitions site crashes under traffic for petition to cancel Brexit

twitter.com

21–30 of 249 posts

Re: UK Parliament petitions site crashes under traffic for petition to cancel Brexit

#21
Petitions for Brexit are completely pointless.

We already know half the country wants to leave and half wants to stay, so unless that petition has more than 33 million signatures then it doesn't prove much does it.

(FYI: I voted remain and think Brexit is completely dumb, but it doesn't change how pointless petitions are for subjects where it's well established what people's opinions are)

Re: UK Parliament petitions site crashes under traffic for petition to cancel Brexit

#22
post #16

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Well that's how this whole thing started, minus the internet part..

It was a proper referendum, not very comparable to easily game-able internet poll.

Not easy to game at all aye https://i.imgsir.com/RZKw.png

I get what you're saying but this poll is to say "Please look at this further" not "Please instantly do this thing in the poll"

Re: UK Parliament petitions site crashes under traffic for petition to cancel Brexit

#23

Petitions for Brexit are completely pointless. We already know half the country wants to leave and half wants to stay, so unless that petition has more than 33 million signatures then it doesn't prove much does it. (FYI: I voted remain and think Brexit is completely dumb, but it doesn't change how pointless petitions are for subjects where it's well established what people's opinions are)

While I think this petition will fall on deaf ears, you can't definitively say "half the country wants to leave and half wants to stay", because not all of the country voted in the referendum. Likewise, you could say:

voting population of UK - 17.6m leave votes = people who didn't vote for Brexit

Which is a huge majority and by that measure we shouldn't leave. I don't agree with that standpoint either, but both your viewpoint and that are misrepresentations.

Re: UK Parliament petitions site crashes under traffic for petition to cancel Brexit

#24

These petitions are almost always met with a boilerplate response. There was a recent one (which I can't find as the site's currently down) regarding Russian interference in the last UK election, with the government response being along the lines of "we don't know what you're talking about, move on". More on that here: https://www.reddit.com/r/unitedkingdom/comments/b2vmm0/gover... While the huge number of signings o…

The Brexiteers had won when they successfully framed Brexit as "the will of the 17M". Remainers didn't counter-frame this with "50M didn't vote for Brexit". Therefor all the marches, petitions etc. are always/can be ignored in the context of "but the will of the 17M". "Don't Think of an Elephant!" is now such an old book, and still a lot of people haven't read it. Brexiteers have read it it seems.

I think the petition will need more than 17m (genuine) signatures before it'll have the effect it's aiming for.

Not saying the signatures so far aren't genuine, just that to have the desired effect it'll need to be reasonably free from doubt

Re: UK Parliament petitions site crashes under traffic for petition to cancel Brexit

#26

Hey, that's my tweet! At the time it went down, I was seeing 2k signups a minute and rising. I was just thinking how the load handling was impressive when poof it was down. Back now, though, which is also pretty good. https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/241584 UPDATE: It's down again. 502 bad gateway. I was seeing close to 3k signups a minute when it fell over this time. UPDATE 2: Seems to be back? Clearly unsta…

Your tweet had the best pictures, hope you don’t mind!

I noted 3,350 per minute about 20 minutes ago!

Re: UK Parliament petitions site crashes under traffic for petition to cancel Brexit

#27

These petitions are almost always met with a boilerplate response. There was a recent one (which I can't find as the site's currently down) regarding Russian interference in the last UK election, with the government response being along the lines of "we don't know what you're talking about, move on". More on that here: https://www.reddit.com/r/unitedkingdom/comments/b2vmm0/gover... While the huge number of signings o…

The Brexiteers had won when they successfully framed Brexit as "the will of the 17M". Remainers didn't counter-frame this with "50M didn't vote for Brexit". Therefor all the marches, petitions etc. are always/can be ignored in the context of "but the will of the 17M". "Don't Think of an Elephant!" is now such an old book, and still a lot of people haven't read it. Brexiteers have read it it seems.

If someone does not vote, when there was ample opportunity to do so, then they implicitly are accepting the outcome - whichever way it goes.

This actually should read "Brexit - The will of the 17m + 50m who are okay with this"

This would have read the same if the result had gone the other way: "Remain - The will of the Xm + 50m who are okay with this"

At the end of the day, there was a vote and more people wanted Brexit, than Remain. A democratic process and result.

Re: UK Parliament petitions site crashes under traffic for petition to cancel Brexit

#28

Hey, that's my tweet! At the time it went down, I was seeing 2k signups a minute and rising. I was just thinking how the load handling was impressive when poof it was down. Back now, though, which is also pretty good. https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/241584 UPDATE: It's down again. 502 bad gateway. I was seeing close to 3k signups a minute when it fell over this time. UPDATE 2: Seems to be back? Clearly unsta…

Your tweet had the best pictures, hope you don’t mind! I noted 3,350 per minute about 20 minutes ago!

Yup. Which probably explains why it just fell over again.

Also no worries for posting :)

Re: UK Parliament petitions site crashes under traffic for petition to cancel Brexit

#29

Petitions for Brexit are completely pointless. We already know half the country wants to leave and half wants to stay, so unless that petition has more than 33 million signatures then it doesn't prove much does it. (FYI: I voted remain and think Brexit is completely dumb, but it doesn't change how pointless petitions are for subjects where it's well established what people's opinions are)

While I think this petition will fall on deaf ears, you can't definitively say "half the country wants to leave and half wants to stay", because not all of the country voted in the referendum. Likewise, you could say: voting population of UK - 17.6m leave votes = people who didn't vote for Brexit Which is a huge majority and by that measure we shouldn't leave. I don't agree with that standpoint either, but both your…

>While I think this petition will fall on deaf ears, you can't definitively say "half the country wants to leave and half wants to stay", because not all of the country voted in the referendum.

Those that didn't vote either way, don't count, and shouldn't count.

Percentages in elections are of active voters.

Unless they were prevented from voting some way, their post-facto protests are meaningless.

You can't have your cake (not give a toss about votes and not participate) and eat it (still have your opinion matter on voted topics) too

Re: UK Parliament petitions site crashes under traffic for petition to cancel Brexit

#30
post #27

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The Brexiteers had won when they successfully framed Brexit as "the will of the 17M". Remainers didn't counter-frame this with "50M didn't vote for Brexit". Therefor all the marches, petitions etc. are always/can be ignored in the context of "but the will of the 17M". "Don't Think of an Elephant!" is now such an old book, and still a lot of people haven't read it. Brexiteers have read it it seems.

If someone does not vote, when there was ample opportunity to do so, then they implicitly are accepting the outcome - whichever way it goes. This actually should read "Brexit - The will of the 17m + 50m who are okay with this" This would have read the same if the result had gone the other way: "Remain - The will of the Xm + 50m who are okay with this" At the end of the day, there was a vote and more people wanted Bre…

Yes I agree, if you don't vote (having voted in every election the last 30y and would never not vote) you're ok with the result and can't complain, but from a Remainer standpoint the framing would be "50M didn't vote for Brexit" - then I'd think their arguing would be easier.

Having watched many Commons discussions, it basically always ends with "but the 17M".

Post reply on HN