Live data from Hacker News

A new class-action lawsuit takes aim at real estate agents and their 6% fee

marketwatch.com

281–290 of 344 posts

Re: A new class-action lawsuit takes aim at real estate agents and their 6% fee

#281
post #146

I'm a software engineer, and I started my career at a well known mortgage company in Detroit. Views are my own, BTW. I bought a house a couple years after I started working there, and I wanted the full home-purchaser experience. I used my company's services for everything, and as an employee they hooked me up with a real estate agent (among other things). I was honestly appalled at what little my real estate agent di…

this is exactly correct. i used a redfin agent and felt like he was discriminated against by the seller agents at every turn.

Re: A new class-action lawsuit takes aim at real estate agents and their 6% fee

#282
post #146

I'm a software engineer, and I started my career at a well known mortgage company in Detroit. Views are my own, BTW. I bought a house a couple years after I started working there, and I wanted the full home-purchaser experience. I used my company's services for everything, and as an employee they hooked me up with a real estate agent (among other things). I was honestly appalled at what little my real estate agent di…

> plus I paid her a 2% commission instead of 3%, and of course not 6% as if she represented me as well. I tried selling my home twice: first with the “normal” approach, using a real estate agent and paying everybody full commission. My agent just didn’t do enough to move the process along. After my contract with her expired, I bid her goodbye. On attempt #2, I listed it myself (for sale by owner) but put in the listi…

very nice. way to hack the system

Re: A new class-action lawsuit takes aim at real estate agents and their 6% fee

#283
post #146

I'm a software engineer, and I started my career at a well known mortgage company in Detroit. Views are my own, BTW. I bought a house a couple years after I started working there, and I wanted the full home-purchaser experience. I used my company's services for everything, and as an employee they hooked me up with a real estate agent (among other things). I was honestly appalled at what little my real estate agent di…

I’ll offer the alternate viewpoint. My parents sold a house last year in northern Virginia. During the market peak it was around 60% above what they bought it for in 2002, but by 2018, objective market price was 25% above purchase price. My parents—having experienced the 1990-2000s housing boom—could not believe it should be on the market for less than 50% above. A good seller’s agent absolutely helped them come to a proper asking price and made the sale happen.

Most buyers and sellers are not completely rational about houses, because they’re not repeat players. There is a good argument that agents help the market stay liquid and facilitate transactions happening.

Re: A new class-action lawsuit takes aim at real estate agents and their 6% fee

#284
post #146

I'm a software engineer, and I started my career at a well known mortgage company in Detroit. Views are my own, BTW. I bought a house a couple years after I started working there, and I wanted the full home-purchaser experience. I used my company's services for everything, and as an employee they hooked me up with a real estate agent (among other things). I was honestly appalled at what little my real estate agent di…

I see many (likely realtors) defending the fees & the larger model. Here is some back of envelop math I once did to put it in perspective: according to Bob Shiller (of case/shiller fame) it has historically taken about 30 years of work to own a house in steady markets. now on an average people move houses once every 7 years due to labor mobility/family/etc reasons. so roughly 4 housing buy/sell transactions in an ave…

Math isn't correct because most of that 30 years of work is interest on the mortgage, which the realtor doesn't get a cut of.

Re: A new class-action lawsuit takes aim at real estate agents and their 6% fee

#285

Earlier quoted context omitted.

$2M house. 6% commission split 3% to seller's realtor and buyer's realtor. Seller's realtor gets $60K if it sells in 1 month or 1 year, same commission. No sale = $0. First week gets a 10% low offer of $1,800,000. If sale completes, that's $54,000 income for the realtor (.03*1800000). Or, could hold out for a better offer after for some months of additional work to hopefully get an offer for the full $2M, and the rea…

...after for some months of additional work... I'm as suspicious of realtors as anybody, but this scenario here includes a real asshole as a seller. If she doesn't want to sell her house, she shouldn't waste everybody's time by putting it on the market. This sort of "just testing the market" shenanigan raises costs for everyone.

In the scenario the seller is gaining $200K by waiting two months. You think she should forgo this money to save everyone else's time looking at her ads?

I personally try and be a polite person, but I'm not $200K polite.

Re: A new class-action lawsuit takes aim at real estate agents and their 6% fee

#286

It blows my mind that the fees are percentage based. The amount of work required for an agent on a 100K house is very similar to that of a 2 Mill house. Presumably the seller agent wishes to get compensation for increasing the value of the house, but for both the seller and buyer agents, the number of deals done far outweighs slight incremental selling prices. In which case, both would prefer to settle on a lower pri…

Basically, http://freakonomics.com/2008/02/26/real-estate-agents-revisi...

Re: A new class-action lawsuit takes aim at real estate agents and their 6% fee

#287
post #273
post #48

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Agreed 100%. Realtors do legitimate work, and deserve to be compensated for sure. But I think the pay is grossly disproportionate to the amount of value provided, and it's propped up by Realtor-sponsored laws and kickbacks. A lot of Realtors won't even deal with non-Realtor(tm) real-estate agents, which promotes their monopoly stranglehold on the real-estate market. I'm not sure where I fall on what a real-estate age…

I think though the average Realtor doesn't sell many houses in a year. I hear it is something like 12 sales/year. According to the Realtor website, the average gross income is around $40k.

Also, if the realtor is part of a bigger company, they don't keep all 3%.

Re: A new class-action lawsuit takes aim at real estate agents and their 6% fee

#288

I'm about to graduate college and move to NYC for a job. The unfortunate norm there is to pay a 15% fee (of the annual rent) to brokers to get a rental apartment. The cheapest the broker's fee gets is one month's rent, so about 8.33% of the annual rent. High end apartments sometimes pay the broker's fee on the renter's behalf [2]. Large apartment complexes sometimes have their own leasing offices, so there's no fee t…

Moved to NYC and paid a broker $8k+ for an apartment I had found by myself on streeteasy, and rent was around $3.5k... To this day my wife and I refer to her as "the parasite". She provided ZERO value other than showing me around the building, which any of the 20-person staff in the building could have done, and in any case certainly doesn't justify paying her more than TWO months' rent

I'm surprised there is not more progressive backlash against apartment brokers in NYC. Plain as day rent seekers disproportionally affecting people with low incomes. Who are their friends?

Re: A new class-action lawsuit takes aim at real estate agents and their 6% fee

#289
post #11

Earlier quoted context omitted.

There are 1.3 million Realtors(tm) in the U.S. Imagine what a productivity boon it would be if even half of them switched to gainful employment versus rent extraction via their cartel!

Better watch what you ask for. When they switched to no-fault car insurance in my home state, many years ago, the number of non-car-related lawsuits skyrocketed.

All disruptions to complex systems come with side effects, but they are often still worthwhile.

Re: A new class-action lawsuit takes aim at real estate agents and their 6% fee

#290

Earlier quoted context omitted.

$2M house. 6% commission split 3% to seller's realtor and buyer's realtor. Seller's realtor gets $60K if it sells in 1 month or 1 year, same commission. No sale = $0. First week gets a 10% low offer of $1,800,000. If sale completes, that's $54,000 income for the realtor (.03*1800000). Or, could hold out for a better offer after for some months of additional work to hopefully get an offer for the full $2M, and the rea…

...after for some months of additional work... I'm as suspicious of realtors as anybody, but this scenario here includes a real asshole as a seller. If she doesn't want to sell her house, she shouldn't waste everybody's time by putting it on the market. This sort of "just testing the market" shenanigan raises costs for everyone.

Statistically, per freaknomics, a realtor selling their own home lists their house 10 days longer so they can get a better offer.

https://www.bankrate.com/finance/real-estate/real-estate-age...

Levitt and Dubner found that, on average, self-listed homes stay on the market an extra 10 days, prompting the authors to hypothesize that agents might be a little more aggressive about their own homes because a 3 percent fluctuation makes a fair difference on the total sale price, but not that much of a difference when it comes to the commission.

Post reply on HN