Live data from Hacker News

Pixelfed – An alternative to centralized image sharing platforms

pixelfed.social

41–50 of 110 posts

Re: Pixelfed – An alternative to centralized image sharing platforms

#41
post #38

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Which pod do I choose? That is actually a great UX question. For federated services how do you think we best solve this? I mean everyone wants to just not pick one. But different loss suits people better in terms of location/interests/something else. UX folks, what patterns would you suggest to help solve this?

Which email provider do I choose? Email is a mature example of a federated system, and so if there is an answer to the general question, I'd expect we'll have figured it out in the context of email. So... what's the "general strategy for picking an email provider?"

Email is a different kettle of fish. It got in there first and only really competed with snail mail. Other alternatives were arguably more complicated. There was no easier alternative to fall back on. If you wanted to communicate on the internet, you had to use email, and by the time there were alternatives, it had a large enough user-base which meant that it was never simply going to be displaced.

Re: Pixelfed – An alternative to centralized image sharing platforms

#42
post #13

I clicked the link and... have no idea what this is. It looks like instagram maybe? I can't even figure out how to figure out what it is. The only clickable thing I see is "@admin" which just takes me to what looks like an Instagram page. It doesn't even mention fediverse on that page, and even if it did, you'd have to know what the fediverse is. This feels like a huge barrier to adoption for them beyond the nerdiest…

It's actually a pretty obvious Instagram knockoff if you go to the homepage. They have almost pixel perfect identical landing pages, and the app also looks extremely similar.

Re: Pixelfed – An alternative to centralized image sharing platforms

#43
post #16
post #13

I clicked the link and... have no idea what this is. It looks like instagram maybe? I can't even figure out how to figure out what it is. The only clickable thing I see is "@admin" which just takes me to what looks like an Instagram page. It doesn't even mention fediverse on that page, and even if it did, you'd have to know what the fediverse is. This feels like a huge barrier to adoption for them beyond the nerdiest…

It is an instagram knockoff. I think they are avoiding the fediverse mention on purpose in order to get users by just marketing it as an alternative without any special magic. This about page as a landing page is really confusing but the homepage doesn't do much better... Also registration is closed so this is a really strange time to be advertising

The author posts regular updates on Mastodon that I follow. From my understanding, federation is relatively new, and he seems to focus on expanding the functionalities of the core product right now instead of focusing on the presentation.

So indeed, it is a bit of an awkward time for it to be on the front page here.

Re: Pixelfed – An alternative to centralized image sharing platforms

#44
post #23

> Registrations are closed. I think the lack of a common name/URL is the biggest problem that is preventing federated open source social networks from gaining mass popularity. I remember when identi.ca came out as an alternative to Twitter. It seemed like it was starting to gain some traction, then they switched to pump.io and closed registrations. I haven't heard of anyone using either since. Look at Diaspora, that…

> Which pod do I choose? That is actually a great UX question. For federated services how do you think we best solve this? I mean everyone wants to just not pick one. But different loss suits people better in terms of location/interests/something else. UX folks, what patterns would you suggest to help solve this?

Did you check out Mastodon's current solution?

Scroll a bit down and you'll see that you can filter through the servers based on your language and interests, as well as see the amount of users each server has. https://joinmastodon.org/

Re: Pixelfed – An alternative to centralized image sharing platforms

#46
post #15

A few questions: Is this compatible with existng solutions like Mastodon? And why just images? Why not videos/documents/music or even events? How long will the images be available? Who is paying for storage? How does the technology compare to IPFS?

1) Yes, these speak the common ActivityPub protocol. 2) It's purposeful specialization. PeerTube is a video hosting service, Funkwhale is a music hosting service, GetTogether is an event hosting service. No idea what services provide online document services - they likely aren't ActivityPub-compatible. 3) Ask the administrator of your instance. The Fediverse, of which PixelFed is part, is composed of a mesh of networ…

> No idea what services provide online document services - they likely aren't ActivityPub-compatible.

Nextcloud is ActivityPub compatible and might suit that use case.

Re: Pixelfed – An alternative to centralized image sharing platforms

#47
post #5

Twitter alternatives (mastodon), instagram alternative (pixelfed), reddit alternative (prismo.news)... Things are looking great!

I love the spirit, but I feel like it's gunna be hard for a straight-clone decentralized site to gain traction. I think you need to combine fresh site ideas along w/ the decent to really gain traction.

Re: Pixelfed – An alternative to centralized image sharing platforms

#48

Earlier quoted context omitted.

For now I am still on Reddit but another open source alternative to Reddit that I learned about earlier today is https://tildes.net/ . Judging from the amount of votes and comments they have very few users as of yet. Will be interesting to see how Tildes develops over time.

https://tildes.net doesn't seem to be federated. Is it?

How do you get an account there?

Re: Pixelfed – An alternative to centralized image sharing platforms

#49
post #38

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Which pod do I choose? That is actually a great UX question. For federated services how do you think we best solve this? I mean everyone wants to just not pick one. But different loss suits people better in terms of location/interests/something else. UX folks, what patterns would you suggest to help solve this?

Which email provider do I choose? Email is a mature example of a federated system, and so if there is an answer to the general question, I'd expect we'll have figured it out in the context of email. So... what's the "general strategy for picking an email provider?"

> So... what's the "general strategy for picking an email provider?"

Pick Gmail unless you have a good reason not to. And if you don't know any reasons pick Gmail.

Federation sounds nice until you realize that most people don't have particularly unique needs and a 'best for most people' will eventually emerge and dominate the market.

Re: Pixelfed – An alternative to centralized image sharing platforms

#50
post #43
post #16

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It is an instagram knockoff. I think they are avoiding the fediverse mention on purpose in order to get users by just marketing it as an alternative without any special magic. This about page as a landing page is really confusing but the homepage doesn't do much better... Also registration is closed so this is a really strange time to be advertising

The author posts regular updates on Mastodon that I follow. From my understanding, federation is relatively new, and he seems to focus on expanding the functionalities of the core product right now instead of focusing on the presentation. So indeed, it is a bit of an awkward time for it to be on the front page here.

What's the author's handle? I'd be interested in following to see what's happening.
Post reply on HN