Firefox needs to be the browser OF something, something super simple: privacy, security, convenience, etc. "Reduce Your Online Annoyances" is a bit of a mouthful. Being the browser of "Support Us Or Google Will Own Everything" is likewise not compelling for the vast majority of users. Firefox has the functionality, now it needs to cement its narrative.
“Firefox, the browser without shitware”?
Firefox 66.0 Aims to Reduce Online Annoyances
411–420 of 574 posts
Re: Firefox 66.0 Aims to Reduce Online Annoyances
#412I think the core problem is still tab clutter. Every time I hop onto my iPad to do some light browsing, I have less anxiety. I don't keep many tabs open on mobile/tablet, but I'm already counting 8 opened here as I'm typing on my laptop. Sure, almost everything mentioned in the article is problematic. Then again, maybe it's just us programmed to hit Ctrl-T too much over a decade...
Navigation (forward/back), history, tabs, bookmarks et all are all trying to do various forms of the same thing, and their overall relationship to each other is fundamentally broken, because each individual component is too rigidly defined and isolated.
I should be able to click between a couple buttons to see how tabs are 1) related to each other from a time/clicked/navigation history perspective 2) workspace perspective 3) topic perspective
Re: Firefox 66.0 Aims to Reduce Online Annoyances
#413I think the core problem is still tab clutter. Every time I hop onto my iPad to do some light browsing, I have less anxiety. I don't keep many tabs open on mobile/tablet, but I'm already counting 8 opened here as I'm typing on my laptop. Sure, almost everything mentioned in the article is problematic. Then again, maybe it's just us programmed to hit Ctrl-T too much over a decade...
Re: Firefox 66.0 Aims to Reduce Online Annoyances
#414Re: Firefox 66.0 Aims to Reduce Online Annoyances
#415I think the core problem is still tab clutter. Every time I hop onto my iPad to do some light browsing, I have less anxiety. I don't keep many tabs open on mobile/tablet, but I'm already counting 8 opened here as I'm typing on my laptop. Sure, almost everything mentioned in the article is problematic. Then again, maybe it's just us programmed to hit Ctrl-T too much over a decade...
I would definitely love to see more experimentation around this area.
[0] https://www.androidpolice.com/2018/07/24/chrome-experimentin...
[1] https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/simpleundoclose/em...
Re: Firefox 66.0 Aims to Reduce Online Annoyances
#416Considering the recent "Spectre is here to stay" paper [1], can anyone comment on whether Firefox should be considered secure until the work on process-per-site lands (I believe they are working on it)? [1] https://arxiv.org/abs/1902.05178
> can anyone comment on whether Firefox should be considered secure until the work on process-per-site lands No and Yes. No, theoretically there could be spectre vulns. Practically we have seen zero spectre-based attacks in the wild. It's not a big deal.
Re: Firefox 66.0 Aims to Reduce Online Annoyances
#417Still does not block autoplay on cnn.com, which is my acid test for this. UPDATE: Yes it does, but it's not enabled by default. (?)
Re: Firefox 66.0 Aims to Reduce Online Annoyances
#418Honestly, Reader Mode, in built ad blocker, tree tabs, and containers make Firefox so streamlined for me. I think that Google sites must not be thoroughly tested on firefox though! Vanilla Gmail (no add-ons or theme, but not the basic HTML version) isn't too fast. Not as fast as it used to be a year ago on Chrome either, but not as bad as FF.
Re: Firefox 66.0 Aims to Reduce Online Annoyances
#419Does this include Netflix? It's been getting really annoying to have random videos your mouse is on, as you scroll, start playing automatically.
Netflix is horrible for this. It's even worse on a smart TV, where navigation is already cumbersome enough without auto-play videos starting every time I'm on a menu item for more than a second.
Re: Firefox 66.0 Aims to Reduce Online Annoyances
#420Earlier quoted context omitted.
Networks are thousands of times faster in bandwidth, but they don't have thousands of times less latency. Software is actively working to overcome the limitations of latency, such as with HTTP/2, HTTP/3, and TLS 1.3.
For a page load, why should latency matter once you get below 50 ms? The problem isn’t latency, the problem is that the software stack makes tons of round-trip requests to display some text and images. The modern web makes X11 seem like it was designed by a demoscene coder.