Live data from Hacker News

Firefox 66.0 Aims to Reduce Online Annoyances

blog.mozilla.org

331–340 of 574 posts

Re: Firefox 66.0 Aims to Reduce Online Annoyances

#331

I've switched over to Firefox on all devices. It's especially useful on Android because I can use uBlock and other useful extensions, where Chrome doesn't have any. The only feature I hope for is "hit tab to search" after typing a domain name in the search bar. For example in Chrome I can type "youtube.com" and then hit tab, and then type in a search query.

If you use DDG as your default search engine you can use bangs to get something kind of similar, typing "!yt search query" for example

Re: Firefox 66.0 Aims to Reduce Online Annoyances

#332

I've switched over to Firefox on all devices. It's especially useful on Android because I can use uBlock and other useful extensions, where Chrome doesn't have any. The only feature I hope for is "hit tab to search" after typing a domain name in the search bar. For example in Chrome I can type "youtube.com" and then hit tab, and then type in a search query.

I just wish FF Focus would let you sync your browsing history :(

Re: Firefox 66.0 Aims to Reduce Online Annoyances

#333

> With this update, Firefox is introducing scroll anchoring, which ensures that you’re not going to bounce around on the page as these slow-loading ads load. While I love the idea of videos not automatically playing, I'm almost more excited for the scroll anchoring feature.

I switched back to Firefox about six months ago, and this issue was the only thing that ever made me consider switching back to Chrome; there's one forum I frequent where the "latest unread post" button was basically useless because of this.

Re: Firefox 66.0 Aims to Reduce Online Annoyances

#334

Reposting from the other thread: Slowly but surely the creative potential of the web is eroded until nothing is left but plain text and ads, to thunderous applause. Gross overreaction after gross overreaction and now we're in a state where extensions are a shallow husk of their former glory, you need to jump through legally vague ridiculous hoops to do anything involving user data, a vast trove of great Flash content…

How soon until it's the default that you need to give a website permission to display images I know you're being facetious, but I liked the internet so much better when I used to browse with images off by default. It could be that I was an optimistic 14 year old, or even simple nostalgia, but the internet felt like a cool friendly place back then.

You can still do that and it's fully usable. I used to do that in Firefox with a nice extension that gave some buttons on the extension bar to toggle things when I was tethering to my phone data. Unfortunately not available on the new extension system.

Re: Firefox 66.0 Aims to Reduce Online Annoyances

#335
post #24

Does this mean that custom emacs/vim keybindings can work again?

I use https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/vimium-ff/ and it works well for me.

I thought that when only web extension plugins were allowed shortcut extensions no longer worked. I was using keysnail. I was following https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1215061 but didn't know if it had been resolved. Thanks I'll check that out

Re: Firefox 66.0 Aims to Reduce Online Annoyances

#336

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You're advocating for auto-playing videos and sound, proprietary resource-gobbling flash content, and the nonconsensual abuse of user data? Yes, what a golden age that was. It is a much more persuasive argument that the new controls are simply a reaction to bad actors who corrupted the value the original web provided. Sure, when the internet was a smaller village, nobody needed to lock their door: but then the villag…

I find GDPR overreaching enough to be worse than its absence.

What negative impacts have you seen from GDPR?

Re: Firefox 66.0 Aims to Reduce Online Annoyances

#338

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The "plugin-container" executable is used for all sandboxed processes on Windows. That started out as plug-ins, but now includes web renderers. So the "something inside it" could be script on a web page, or part of Gecko's rendering pipeline, or pretty much anything. And killig it crashes tabs because it's the thing rendering those tabs. It might make sense to rename the executable to make things clearer, but there a…

Oh, my experience was on Mac like the GP’s. Edited to clarify. On Windows or Linux I haven’t encountered a similar 100% CPU use problem, which has led me to suspect it’s specifically the Mac version of some plugin that’s the problem.

Interesting. On Mac, the process is called "plugin-container" if you use something like "ps", but Activity Monitor shows it as "FirefoxCP Web Content", which is a lot clearer...

Re: Firefox 66.0 Aims to Reduce Online Annoyances

#339

I've switched over to Firefox on all devices. It's especially useful on Android because I can use uBlock and other useful extensions, where Chrome doesn't have any. The only feature I hope for is "hit tab to search" after typing a domain name in the search bar. For example in Chrome I can type "youtube.com" and then hit tab, and then type in a search query.

By far the biggest annoyance with firefox on mobile is that when you open the browser, are presented with all your tabs, and a toolbar which only searches your open tabs rather than just being a toolbar that you can type in a website, or a search term, or also search amongst your open tabs.

Re: Firefox 66.0 Aims to Reduce Online Annoyances

#340
post #270

Earlier quoted context omitted.

If sites escalate to gifs or frames advanced by JS, I'll escalate to blocking gifs or JS. Autoplaying video is not acceptable.

I like what Slack does for GIFs: there's some (not sure if configurable) size threshold above which the GIF won't auto-expand. This is something browsers could do in general.

That assumes the browser can know the image's content-length before loading the whole image, which unfortunately isn't always possible.
Post reply on HN