I've switched over to Firefox on all devices. It's especially useful on Android because I can use uBlock and other useful extensions, where Chrome doesn't have any. The only feature I hope for is "hit tab to search" after typing a domain name in the search bar. For example in Chrome I can type "youtube.com" and then hit tab, and then type in a search query.
Firefox 66.0 Aims to Reduce Online Annoyances
331–340 of 574 posts
Re: Firefox 66.0 Aims to Reduce Online Annoyances
#332I've switched over to Firefox on all devices. It's especially useful on Android because I can use uBlock and other useful extensions, where Chrome doesn't have any. The only feature I hope for is "hit tab to search" after typing a domain name in the search bar. For example in Chrome I can type "youtube.com" and then hit tab, and then type in a search query.
Re: Firefox 66.0 Aims to Reduce Online Annoyances
#333> With this update, Firefox is introducing scroll anchoring, which ensures that you’re not going to bounce around on the page as these slow-loading ads load. While I love the idea of videos not automatically playing, I'm almost more excited for the scroll anchoring feature.
Re: Firefox 66.0 Aims to Reduce Online Annoyances
#334Reposting from the other thread: Slowly but surely the creative potential of the web is eroded until nothing is left but plain text and ads, to thunderous applause. Gross overreaction after gross overreaction and now we're in a state where extensions are a shallow husk of their former glory, you need to jump through legally vague ridiculous hoops to do anything involving user data, a vast trove of great Flash content…
How soon until it's the default that you need to give a website permission to display images I know you're being facetious, but I liked the internet so much better when I used to browse with images off by default. It could be that I was an optimistic 14 year old, or even simple nostalgia, but the internet felt like a cool friendly place back then.
Re: Firefox 66.0 Aims to Reduce Online Annoyances
#335Does this mean that custom emacs/vim keybindings can work again?
I use https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/vimium-ff/ and it works well for me.
Re: Firefox 66.0 Aims to Reduce Online Annoyances
#336Earlier quoted context omitted.
You're advocating for auto-playing videos and sound, proprietary resource-gobbling flash content, and the nonconsensual abuse of user data? Yes, what a golden age that was. It is a much more persuasive argument that the new controls are simply a reaction to bad actors who corrupted the value the original web provided. Sure, when the internet was a smaller village, nobody needed to lock their door: but then the villag…
I find GDPR overreaching enough to be worse than its absence.
Re: Firefox 66.0 Aims to Reduce Online Annoyances
#337Is this any different that what Safari has been doing?
Re: Firefox 66.0 Aims to Reduce Online Annoyances
#338Earlier quoted context omitted.
The "plugin-container" executable is used for all sandboxed processes on Windows. That started out as plug-ins, but now includes web renderers. So the "something inside it" could be script on a web page, or part of Gecko's rendering pipeline, or pretty much anything. And killig it crashes tabs because it's the thing rendering those tabs. It might make sense to rename the executable to make things clearer, but there a…
Oh, my experience was on Mac like the GP’s. Edited to clarify. On Windows or Linux I haven’t encountered a similar 100% CPU use problem, which has led me to suspect it’s specifically the Mac version of some plugin that’s the problem.
Re: Firefox 66.0 Aims to Reduce Online Annoyances
#339I've switched over to Firefox on all devices. It's especially useful on Android because I can use uBlock and other useful extensions, where Chrome doesn't have any. The only feature I hope for is "hit tab to search" after typing a domain name in the search bar. For example in Chrome I can type "youtube.com" and then hit tab, and then type in a search query.
Re: Firefox 66.0 Aims to Reduce Online Annoyances
#340Earlier quoted context omitted.
If sites escalate to gifs or frames advanced by JS, I'll escalate to blocking gifs or JS. Autoplaying video is not acceptable.
I like what Slack does for GIFs: there's some (not sure if configurable) size threshold above which the GIF won't auto-expand. This is something browsers could do in general.