At the end unless Firefox doesn't block JavaScript, it won't have much effect. Actually it's also time to ban JavaScript after horrendous front end frameworks made simple page loads slow, energy and time consuming.
Firefox 66.0 Aims to Reduce Online Annoyances
141–150 of 574 posts
Re: Firefox 66.0 Aims to Reduce Online Annoyances
#142Earlier quoted context omitted.
We cant ban just the bad Javascript, a browser cannot distinguish it from the good. And overall, Javascript does more harm than good.
We'll probably just have to agree to disagree re: "JS does more harm than good". I have at least 5 progressive webapps open right now, none of which could work without javascript. Of the other 20 websites I have open in other tabs, none are being annoying or aggressive, and I'm not even using an adblocker.
Re: Firefox 66.0 Aims to Reduce Online Annoyances
#143Earlier quoted context omitted.
That is the most pessimist comment on this thread. Javascript is useful, it is just a shame most people dont use it for good.
We cant ban just the bad Javascript, a browser cannot distinguish it from the good. And overall, Javascript does more harm than good.
Installing apps is really not aomething i want. I am trying to keep apps on my phone low for a reason, browser is actually perfect for most of what i do.
Re: Firefox 66.0 Aims to Reduce Online Annoyances
#144Earlier quoted context omitted.
It used to crash under Linux, when you updated it while it was running, and then opened new window or a tab. Now it shows a message that you need to restart.
Has never crashed on update for me, at least that I can remember after ten years. I have seen the warning message, that arrived years ago however. I'll add the caveat that I typically restart my browser at least once a day, perhaps avoids the problem.
Re: Firefox 66.0 Aims to Reduce Online Annoyances
#145> Scroll anchoring keeps content from jumping as images and ads load at the top of the page That's a nice little quality-of-life improvement. It's a little annoyance that you don't really consciously notice because you're so used to it, but I recall reading about Chrome adding a similar feature and suddenly realising how annoying it is when you're reading something, and then suddenly it jumps out of your view due to…
Wouldn't it be nice if browsers or servers could reserve that space even if it's not loaded? Like "this is going to be a 500x200 image so let's load 500x200 pixels worth of empty space until it's fully loaded" and avoid jumping.
Re: Firefox 66.0 Aims to Reduce Online Annoyances
#146Earlier quoted context omitted.
We'll probably just have to agree to disagree re: "JS does more harm than good". I have at least 5 progressive webapps open right now, none of which could work without javascript. Of the other 20 websites I have open in other tabs, none are being annoying or aggressive, and I'm not even using an adblocker.
They could be proper applications instead.
If it was just as easy to write and distribute native applications, we'd be doing that, instead of bolting it onto the web. But it's pretty clearly not.
Re: Firefox 66.0 Aims to Reduce Online Annoyances
#147At the end unless Firefox doesn't block JavaScript, it won't have much effect. Actually it's also time to ban JavaScript after horrendous front end frameworks made simple page loads slow, energy and time consuming.
Re: Firefox 66.0 Aims to Reduce Online Annoyances
#148Earlier quoted context omitted.
We cant ban just the bad Javascript, a browser cannot distinguish it from the good. And overall, Javascript does more harm than good.
Citation needed. I dont believe gmail would be as useful eithout javascript, docs wouldnt really be possible, i dont think i could video chat with my family without extensions, and so on. Installing apps is really not aomething i want. I am trying to keep apps on my phone low for a reason, browser is actually perfect for most of what i do.
Re: Firefox 66.0 Aims to Reduce Online Annoyances
#149https://i.imgur.com/mzmsdzt.png They added this to my home page, despite the fact that my default search provider is DDG. Mozilla, could you STOP bundling advertisements into my browser?
Re: Firefox 66.0 Aims to Reduce Online Annoyances
#150Earlier quoted context omitted.
Yes, technically. But the user experience is fewer tabs crashing, which I'd argue is what user's care about. You notice a crash because of the tab's "oh no" screen, not by watching `ps`.
I see. That starts to make sense if you explain it that way. Users who don't think about the multiprocessing model will just see fewer dead tabs when a FF process crashes, and that could feel like "fewer crashes".