Barcelona Fines Landlords Who Let Buildings Sit Empty
241–250 of 332 posts
Re: Barcelona Fines Landlords Who Let Buildings Sit Empty
#242Amsterdam has (or used to have, perhaps) a pretty healthy squatting culture. Many squatters are ideologically driven and improve the neighbourhoods they're squatting in.
Re: Barcelona Fines Landlords Who Let Buildings Sit Empty
#243I'm curious about the legal grounds for such a tax or fine. If local zoning already governs what may be built or operated on a property, what principle allows a government to levy fines for lack of use of a property that has been built and maintained to the required zoning? (if to all other requirements, the property is not derelict, in poor condition, a blight or public nuisance?) I didn't think that you could be co…
Leaving a property empty to wait for price appreciation is clearly not residential use.
Re: Barcelona Fines Landlords Who Let Buildings Sit Empty
#244"Do you have a lease contract?" Easy to get a lot of $1 contracts...
"Did you use water / electricity?" Easy to leave a faucet running or set up bitcoin miners.
If you go on word of mouth? What about false positives -- I travel for work and keep an apartment in one city and my house in another. Would that be a problem?
I don't know how to penalize empty apartments in a way that isn't really easy to game, or unjustly fair for people who don't just live in one place.
Re: Barcelona Fines Landlords Who Let Buildings Sit Empty
#245In Amsterdam, any property that has been empty for over a year can be legally squatted, and once in, legal squatters may be hard to get out. For this reason, landlords tend to rent out their empty properties cheaply as "anti-kraak" (anti-squat), on the condition that the tenant moves out when the landlord needs the property again. This is quite popular for students because you often get a ridiculous amount of space f…
Re: Barcelona Fines Landlords Who Let Buildings Sit Empty
#246In Amsterdam, any property that has been empty for over a year can be legally squatted, and once in, legal squatters may be hard to get out. For this reason, landlords tend to rent out their empty properties cheaply as "anti-kraak" (anti-squat), on the condition that the tenant moves out when the landlord needs the property again. This is quite popular for students because you often get a ridiculous amount of space f…
Re: Barcelona Fines Landlords Who Let Buildings Sit Empty
#247In Amsterdam, any property that has been empty for over a year can be legally squatted, and once in, legal squatters may be hard to get out. For this reason, landlords tend to rent out their empty properties cheaply as "anti-kraak" (anti-squat), on the condition that the tenant moves out when the landlord needs the property again. This is quite popular for students because you often get a ridiculous amount of space f…
Re: Barcelona Fines Landlords Who Let Buildings Sit Empty
#248I'm curious about the legal grounds for such a tax or fine. If local zoning already governs what may be built or operated on a property, what principle allows a government to levy fines for lack of use of a property that has been built and maintained to the required zoning? (if to all other requirements, the property is not derelict, in poor condition, a blight or public nuisance?) I didn't think that you could be co…
Can only state the case for Germany, here, the constitution explicitly states that "Ownership entails responsibilities" and that ownership is not absolute but subject to greater good considerations. If someone would implement a law or rule like the one in Barcelona (or probably Vancouver) in Germany, it would probably be based on such a consideration. IANAL, mind.
"3. Nadie podrá ser privado de sus bienes y derechos sino por causa justificada de utilidad pública o interés social, mediante la correspondiente indemnización y de conformidad con lo dispuesto por las leyes."
"No one shall be deprived of their goods and rights but for a justified reason of public utility or social interest, with fitting compensation and conforming to applicable laws".
It's the exact same: social interest and public utility are enshrined in the constitution for the exercise of eminent property.
Re: Barcelona Fines Landlords Who Let Buildings Sit Empty
#249In Amsterdam, any property that has been empty for over a year can be legally squatted, and once in, legal squatters may be hard to get out. For this reason, landlords tend to rent out their empty properties cheaply as "anti-kraak" (anti-squat), on the condition that the tenant moves out when the landlord needs the property again. This is quite popular for students because you often get a ridiculous amount of space f…
How did you quantify the improvement?
Re: Barcelona Fines Landlords Who Let Buildings Sit Empty
#250In Amsterdam, any property that has been empty for over a year can be legally squatted, and once in, legal squatters may be hard to get out. For this reason, landlords tend to rent out their empty properties cheaply as "anti-kraak" (anti-squat), on the condition that the tenant moves out when the landlord needs the property again. This is quite popular for students because you often get a ridiculous amount of space f…
Its "had" isnt it? Squatting was made illegal in 2010 if i recall correctly.