Live data from Hacker News

Beto O'Rourke's membership in America's oldest hacking group

reuters.com

311–320 of 400 posts

Re: Beto O'Rourke's membership in America's oldest hacking group

#312
post #44
post #29

He's nice and all, but can we go back to electing Presidents who have had lots of executive and political experience ?

What, was being an elected congressman not enough?

Though some Presidents have served as house representatives in their past, none of them made the Presidency without doing something else in between their house service and winning the presidency.

https://history.house.gov/People/Other-Office/Member-Preside...

Re: Beto O'Rourke's membership in America's oldest hacking group

#313

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Do texts that contain bomb-making information really fall under the first amendment in the US?

"Imminent lawless action" is the current constitutional standard.

Um. So - if by "lawless" you mean: "reading a book about making bombs" . . .

Re: Beto O'Rourke's membership in America's oldest hacking group

#314
post #182

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I agree the piece isn't very informative and is very scattered. That being said, this is definitely the most questionable thing: > "When he was younger, he was arrested on drunk-driving charges" That will follow him into the campaign far more than his CDC membership.

Is being arrested for drunken driving materially different than having not been arrested while drunken driving? And hasn’t pretty much almost anyone driven drunk at least once?

To your second question, no. To your first — it seems likelier that Beto had more than one drunk driving occasion before the time he was arrested. The circumstances of his arrest don’t look the best for him, with one witness claiming he attempted to leave the scene of the accident: https://www.politifact.com/texas/statements/2018/sep/25/beto...

Re: Beto O'Rourke's membership in America's oldest hacking group

#315
post #312
post #44

Earlier quoted context omitted.

What, was being an elected congressman not enough?

Though some Presidents have served as house representatives in their past, none of them made the Presidency without doing something else in between their house service and winning the presidency. https://history.house.gov/People/Other-Office/Member-Preside...

Still satisfies the stated refrain of "having political experience", but an interesting historical factoid nonetheless.

Re: Beto O'Rourke's membership in America's oldest hacking group

#317
post #268

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> ~80/90s hackers aren't really the same thing as most post 00 hackers. Yeah, no hackers from the 80s and 90s ever had any bad intents. /sarcasm

The meaning of the word has changed somewhat; it was mostly about curiosity and exploration in the 80s/90s. Less of the economy was reliant on computers so there wasn't much crime to commit beyond mere unauthorized access. Heck, "2600: The Hacker Quarterly" could be found on the magazine rack at Barnes & Noble back then.

And minor celebrities within 2600's culture, namely Emmanuel and Cpt. Crunch used that celebrity to creep on teenaged dudes.

Re: Beto O'Rourke's membership in America's oldest hacking group

#318
post #50
post #9

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Andrew Yang knows about it, check him out https://www.yang2020.com

Yang doesn’t have a snowballs chance in hell. He’s posturing just to raise his own public profile.

Why would he though? He doesn’t have a brand like Trump does.

Re: Beto O'Rourke's membership in America's oldest hacking group

#320

Earlier quoted context omitted.

What's your point? I'm not certain of my inferences from your comment, but you seem to be missing the context of what he's saying. He's leading into that with the underlying (and very valid IMO) assumptions that economic trends can yield predictive power for cultural outcomes, and that China (and thus Chinese people to the more homogeneous populations of the US) will be heavily demonized due to the ongoing economic s…

It's an fairly divisive comment to accuse some group of people of the futurecrime of murdering your own people in churches. That's a serious accusation of something that hasn't happened yet. I don't remember anyone blaming "Asians" for Virginia Tech, and rightfully so.

His general point is that economic inequality leads to social distress leads to violence, often targeting scapegoated groups, such as those belonging to demographics shared by rival foreign powers. Is that so objectionable?
Post reply on HN