FB Response: https://twitter.com/fbnewsroom/status/1105993038671691776?s=... > It's already been reported that there are ongoing federal investigations, incl. by the Dept of Justice. As we’ve said, we're cooperating w/ investigators and take those probes seriously. We've provided public testimony, answered questions, and pledged that we'll continue to do so
Does anyone ever say they're not cooperating with investigators?
Facebook’s Data Deals Are Under Criminal Investigation
131–140 of 248 posts
Re: Facebook’s Data Deals Are Under Criminal Investigation
#132I was personally involved in a leadership role in one of these key strategic deals while at a major handset maker. To be clear, we built the 'Facebook experience' for our device because only we really could. During this era, APIs were a disaster of a mess, moreover, the special API that made the device so special was not available to the public. Ironically it was our internal APIs that were making the special sauce!…
Re: Facebook’s Data Deals Are Under Criminal Investigation
#133Re: Facebook’s Data Deals Are Under Criminal Investigation
#134What is NYT source for this story?
A leak about the existence of an investigation?
NYT journalist saw entries for grand jury subpoenas on PACER?
How do they know the crime has to do with data deals?
We must wait until complaint is filed before anyone can disclose the statute allegedly violated, correct?
Re: Facebook’s Data Deals Are Under Criminal Investigation
#135Re: Facebook’s Data Deals Are Under Criminal Investigation
#136"reports last June and December that Facebook had given business partners — including makers of smartphones, tablets and other devices — deep access to users’ personal information, letting some companies effectively override users’ privacy settings."
suggests breach-of-contract. Just by creating those privacy settings, the company is 'saying' to (promising) the customer who elects to use them that it will protect that information. That's an (implied) contract. Subsequently allowing anyone else to access that information is a breach.
It'd be interesting to see FB argue in court that breaking promises was okay as a form of restitution for the services they provide.
Re: Facebook’s Data Deals Are Under Criminal Investigation
#137There has been a tremendous amount of grassroots lobbying, fundraising, and private investigation in New York over the past two years with respect to Facebook. It’s a serious area I feel Silicon Valley has abdicated its moral obligation to stand up to its own. Hoping we can develop the evidence that comes out of this case into criminal charges for individual engineers and senior officers.
So let's incriminate engineers for building a faulty airplane too.
229 If a builder builds a house for someone, and does not construct it properly, and the house which he built falls and kills its owner, then that builder shall be put to death.
230. If it kills the son of the owner, the son of that builder shall be put to death.
Re: Facebook’s Data Deals Are Under Criminal Investigation
#138IANAL. But this: "reports last June and December that Facebook had given business partners — including makers of smartphones, tablets and other devices — deep access to users’ personal information, letting some companies effectively override users’ privacy settings." suggests breach-of-contract. Just by creating those privacy settings, the company is 'saying' to (promising) the customer who elects to use them that it…
scale matters on these issues as well.
and if you are doing it as a big utility company (e.g. banks) then you are free to go :)
Re: Facebook’s Data Deals Are Under Criminal Investigation
#139Re: Facebook’s Data Deals Are Under Criminal Investigation
#140IANAL. But this: "reports last June and December that Facebook had given business partners — including makers of smartphones, tablets and other devices — deep access to users’ personal information, letting some companies effectively override users’ privacy settings." suggests breach-of-contract. Just by creating those privacy settings, the company is 'saying' to (promising) the customer who elects to use them that it…
If it's for one user then it's a breach of contract, if you do that for 10 million, that's a deliberate act of breaching all contracts and that is usually criminal. scale matters on these issues as well. and if you are doing it as a big utility company (e.g. banks) then you are free to go :)