Live data from Hacker News

RIM kicks Kik off Blackberries: Revokes keys, disables push

kik.com

51–60 of 75 posts

Re: RIM kicks Kik off Blackberries: Revokes keys, disables push

#51

[Update: RIM has now responded with the following comment, referring to a breach of "contractual obligations," but is not specifying what those obligations were: "RIM became aware of a number of issues and customer concerns regarding the Kik app and service. Following discussions with Kik, the app was removed from BlackBerry App World on November 12. Upon further investigation, RIM concluded that Kik had breached con…

Translation: "You're competing with our BBM service and you have to go before it starts costing us sales".

Re: RIM kicks Kik off Blackberries: Revokes keys, disables push

#53
post #48

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It depends how you define 'stupid'. I see advertisements day in and day out for BBM. Not for RIM's latest phone, not for a new RIM app, but specifically for BBM. Why? Because RIM has realized that one of the only things keeping a large % of their user base around is BBM. Their OS is horrible, their devices are nothing special, but BBM is arguably the best mobile messaging product out there (so good that Kik pretty mu…

^^Agree. Kik is a BBM clone. Surprisingly badly done, actually, from what I can tell - but still, it's aiming straight for BBM. If it gains traction, it might turn into a BBM competitor which is available on all platforms, thereby removing _the_ primary reason BBs sell like hotcakes here in Asia. I guess I should backtrack - BB in SE Asia (and probably other regions world wide) is THE must have phone for every studen…

Which part of "SE Asia"? BB is popular in Indonesia, but that's about it.

The "it" phone everywhere else has always been iPhone and shipping times have been stuck at 2 weeks as recently as early November.

Google Trends bears this out. There is not a single ASEAN country other than Indonesia where BB comes out ahead in normalized searches.

Re: RIM kicks Kik off Blackberries: Revokes keys, disables push

#54

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It depends how you define 'stupid'. I see advertisements day in and day out for BBM. Not for RIM's latest phone, not for a new RIM app, but specifically for BBM. Why? Because RIM has realized that one of the only things keeping a large % of their user base around is BBM. Their OS is horrible, their devices are nothing special, but BBM is arguably the best mobile messaging product out there (so good that Kik pretty mu…

The lock-in argument doesn't hold much water. RIM already provides IM clients for Google Talk, Yahoo, and MSN, with pretty much the exact same UI and features as BBM. The quality of their Google Talk client is one of the things keeping me on BlackBerry.

BBM = Mobile - Mobile Messaging

GTalk/MSN etc = Mobile - Desktop Messaging

The use cases are completely different.

Re: RIM kicks Kik off Blackberries: Revokes keys, disables push

#55
post #48

Earlier quoted context omitted.

^^Agree. Kik is a BBM clone. Surprisingly badly done, actually, from what I can tell - but still, it's aiming straight for BBM. If it gains traction, it might turn into a BBM competitor which is available on all platforms, thereby removing _the_ primary reason BBs sell like hotcakes here in Asia. I guess I should backtrack - BB in SE Asia (and probably other regions world wide) is THE must have phone for every studen…

Which part of "SE Asia"? BB is popular in Indonesia, but that's about it. The "it" phone everywhere else has always been iPhone and shipping times have been stuck at 2 weeks as recently as early November. Google Trends bears this out. There is not a single ASEAN country other than Indonesia where BB comes out ahead in normalized searches.

BB is also the phone to have in Venezuela, which I just visited a few weeks ago. All because of BBM.

Re: RIM kicks Kik off Blackberries: Revokes keys, disables push

#56
post #31

Not duplicating or competing with the BlackBerry email as well as messaging (BBM) is an explicit part of one of the several legal agreements that developers and RIM partners have to agree to. Technically, KiK is in violation of these terms, which in turn gives RIM legal grounds to kick them out.

Does that mean Whatsapp is also in violation?

Re: RIM kicks Kik off Blackberries: Revokes keys, disables push

#57
post #3

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Disagree. 1) Kik claims to have already submitted a new version of the app that addressed these concerns. 2) The app was already approved and into the store. How is his responsible behavior? 3) How does further disabling Kik’s ability to distribute new versions of the app (by revoking signing keys) help? 4) How does crippling the UX (by disabling push) of the existing install base help anyone? That isn’t, as you say,…

1) Kik claimed. RIM may not have agreed. 2) Maybe it was flagged after it was originally approved. 3) I agree. I'm not sure how submitting a BB app works - I assumed the key was at app-level, not company-level, but I've never submitted a BB app before. 4) This is probably related to the battery life issue. Don't get me wrong - If they kicked it out for being "too similar to BBM", that's a dick move. But if Kik didn't…

I'm not sure how submitting a BB app works

With your dev license, you get access to RIM's signing service. You can distribute code any way you like, but you have to run it through the signing servers before it will run on a device. To shut you down, they just disable your account. Code that is already signed will run forever.

Re: RIM kicks Kik off Blackberries: Revokes keys, disables push

#58

Once again somebody suffers because they compete directly with a core feature of a platform they use to distribute/market themselves. It wouldn't surprise me if all (FB, Apple, Twitter, now RIM) but one (Android) digital platform curation teams acted in the same way. Of course, it is their platform, their right. Android can afford not to because Google have a different business model.

Android seems to have the same problem with Skype: since Google's business model is different from the other mobile OS developers, it falls to the handset makers and carriers to make those sorts of ridiculous decisions. Verizon being the sole carrier with Skype will hurt Skype's adoption on mobile phones because if you want to talk to someone with an Android phone, they have to be a Verizon customer. Thus, it isn't a…

Android seems to have the same problem with Skype

The oddity of Skype is entirely Skype's making -- they saw a revenue model negotiating with carriers (the idea being "Get a Verizon Android phone because then you can get Skype"), so that's what they did. They control their own product, so there it is.

Re: RIM kicks Kik off Blackberries: Revokes keys, disables push

#59
post #54

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The lock-in argument doesn't hold much water. RIM already provides IM clients for Google Talk, Yahoo, and MSN, with pretty much the exact same UI and features as BBM. The quality of their Google Talk client is one of the things keeping me on BlackBerry.

BBM = Mobile - Mobile Messaging GTalk/MSN etc = Mobile - Desktop Messaging The use cases are completely different.

What if you run gtalk on your blackberry, and I run gtalk on my android phone. Is that still Mobile - Desktop?

Re: RIM kicks Kik off Blackberries: Revokes keys, disables push

#60
post #15
post #14

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Can someone who has used BBM explain why it's so great?

It's simple, secure, stable, allows for group chat, notifies you if the message was received or not, and is pre-installed on BlackBerries so everyone with a BlackBerry has it.

Secure? Stable? Could you elaborate? Are all messages encrypted? Are other applications so terrible now-a-days that "doesn't crash!" is a feature? Other than that, it sounds like IRC, with a read notification for those who just need to know if their message hasn't been read yet, or they're being ignored.

I was reading the page looking for grandparent's question, and I still don't see why bbm would be such a huge feature that bb owners just can't live without. Sure, I can see how it may beat sms where international communication may be concerned, and texting someone in a different country doesn't work, and I can see how the group chat is useful, but every single other IM client can offer the same thing... I just don't get it.

Post reply on HN