High prestige, low satisfaction jobs
lemire.me
High prestige, low satisfaction jobs
1–10 of 28 posts
Re: High prestige, low satisfaction jobs
#2Re: High prestige, low satisfaction jobs
#3http://viewtext.org/article?url=http://lemire.me/blog/archiv...
Re: High prestige, low satisfaction jobs
#4Re: High prestige, low satisfaction jobs
#5That's actually no longer true. Hence why a Prof leaves to take a job at Google
Re: High prestige, low satisfaction jobs
#6"In effect, a job doing research in Computer Science is more prestigious than an industry job building real system" That's actually no longer true. Hence why a Prof leaves to take a job at Google
Re: High prestige, low satisfaction jobs
#7Actually, I would view Google's existence as proof that abstract, high-level thinkers actually can do something. Did it not start out as a research project by abstract, high-level thinkers?
I think the author has a point, but the populist, anti-intellectual bent really distracts from that. The point as I see it is that prestige is a benefit for certain jobs, just like money or vacation or insurance. These things are good, but can they make up for a job that you don't see as rewarding?
Re: High prestige, low satisfaction jobs
#8I know some blue collars, plumbers included that are doing really well in the grand scheme of things, but I don't know any that make more than I do, and I'm 20 years younger than them.
Re: High prestige, low satisfaction jobs
#9I can't help but find this entire article flawed because he's basing his analysis on a man who went from Harvard to Google...they're both incredibly prestigious, so really the article is about going from a low satisfaction to a high satisfaction job, which is kind of a no-brainer.