Earlier quoted context omitted.
There's no "IoT" problem here. You can have plenty of automated systems monitoring your infrastructure without the security nightmare of making them accessible on the public internet.
I don't think that IoT implies publicly accessible (correct me if I'm wrong). "IoT" smart water meters exist, and they usually use cellphone networks to send data (water usage) to the utility company.
China’s tech sector is in the doldrums
41–47 of 47 posts
Re: China’s tech sector is in the doldrums
#42> By one count 48 million people in China lack sufficient drinking water. The number of people facing severe drinking water shortages doubled to 5.9 million in early 2008 because of a severe winter drought. China has more than a fifth of the world's population but only 7 percent of its fresh water. Not from the article, but if there was a startup needed and one that could jump start their sector there, a significant…
If 48 million people in china lack drinking water, that's a problem of resource management rather than resource.
China has a 5th of the world's population but they also have ridiculously rich soil along it's many large rivers - especially towards the southern portion of china. The same thing with india. They have immensely rich lands that can support a huge number of people. Unlike canada who has a lot of freshwater but is mostly frozen tundra.
This is why stats are so deceiving. India is about 1/4th the size of siberia but india can support 1000X the population of siberia because india's land/soil is rich and productive while siberia is not.
Re: China’s tech sector is in the doldrums
#43Any time I see an article about China's tech doom I'm skeptical. Are there any solid, trustworthy sources for statistics on these matters? Where should I be looking for signal?
Re: China’s tech sector is in the doldrums
#44Any time I see an article about China's tech doom I'm skeptical. Are there any solid, trustworthy sources for statistics on these matters? Where should I be looking for signal?
All western, liberal media sources refuse to publish anything that paints China in a good light. I think it is because the US is falling behind while China is pushing forward. However, China media sources are as completely bias as western sources, only in the opposite direction. I suspect reality is some where in the middle.
What I also see a lot is that when the mainstream press reports something that is going bad in China, then China defenders will say something like you just did.
Re: China’s tech sector is in the doldrums
#45Any time I see an article about China's tech doom I'm skeptical. Are there any solid, trustworthy sources for statistics on these matters? Where should I be looking for signal?
It's like using ZeroHedge as your source of news. It is not inaccurate (they generally link to reputable sources), but potentially overblown or out of context.
Re: China’s tech sector is in the doldrums
#46Earlier quoted context omitted.
Unrelated, but interesting in this context: Michael Burry, one of the guys who predicted 2007 housing bubble (and made good money thanks to that), is investing in water. Looks like he might be right again.
How does one (without access to exotic financial instruments) even do that?
1. Buy-side - ETF for companies leading in clean water or purification, or the second level that companies provide components for those companies in the first group.
2. Sell-side - bet on the companies will do badly in the situation e.g big polluters.
But the hard thing is timing, you can sit there for decades for the outcome and so many factors can affect your bet between now and then.
Re: China’s tech sector is in the doldrums
#47Earlier quoted context omitted.
I don't think that IoT implies publicly accessible (correct me if I'm wrong). "IoT" smart water meters exist, and they usually use cellphone networks to send data (water usage) to the utility company.
The "I" in "IoT" stands for "internet". If the only thing "IoT" means is 'small digital sensors', then I'd suggest it's a meaningless buzzword.