Hacker News Board Hacker News, browsed like a classic message board
Live data from Hacker News

You Can't Solve the Gender Gap in Tech If You Don't Understand Why It Exists

buzzfeednews.com

Post reply on HN
Print view View original

21–30 of 31 posts

Re: You Can't Solve the Gender Gap in Tech If You Don't Understand Why It Exists

#21

Post by pseudalopex »

eloisius wrote: post #9
octokatt wrote: post #6

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yes. Because the focus of the article is about how the gender gap/discrimination in tech issue is nuanced, and the other is literally talking about default stereotypes in tech and how they are damaging. Literally, the article invoked a stereotype, because the overwhelmingly common stereotype is damaging.

Not sure what you're saying, but it sounds like we're kind of agreeing, maybe? It just seems pointless to urge that we quit using tired tropes to solve a problem, but then immediately invoke another trope to make your point. Are men coding alone in their basements really the problem?

Calling out a stereotype is not invoking it.

Re: You Can't Solve the Gender Gap in Tech If You Don't Understand Why It Exists

#22

Post by bassman9000 »

curtis wrote: post #20
Simulacra wrote: post #13

As a woman in technology, a coder no less, I totally understand the pipeline problem. Men dominated technology in the very early days, and men made up most of the workforce. As much as society, government, and education attempt to force women into STEM fields, it's going to take a while before there are enough women, with enough experience, to truly equalize compensation. As for girls opting out of coding, that's ok.…

> Not all girls want to code, and not all girls want to take a STEM path, and that should not be see as some failure. It's also true that not all boys want to code, and not all boys want to take a STEM path. But what if a larger percentage of boys want to code or take a STEM path? If this were so, it would look like a pipeline problem, and it would look like a pipeline problem that's quite hard to fix. It might actua…

But what if a larger percentage of boys want to code or take a STEM path? If this were so, it would look like a pipeline problem, and it would look like a pipeline problem that's quite hard to fix. It might actually look like the reality we currently see.

Why is that a problem? Why is it something to fix? Why do we want to achieve perfect 50% ratios on people's motivations and desires?

edit: typo

Re: You Can't Solve the Gender Gap in Tech If You Don't Understand Why It Exists

#23

Post by pseudalopex »

president wrote: post #18
eloisius wrote: post #14

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I think the article is trying to say that the state of the pipeline is what it is because of the way that the end of it appears to those who might be in the beginning of it. Young women aren't going to stay in the pipeline for a career that looks like they will have a hard time excelling in once they reach adulthood. Despite my distaste for the authors invoking basement coder stereotypes, I can see their point. We ca…

Sexism and harassment is even more prevalent in the entertainment industry and there are plenty of women working in entertainment. Although I agree sexism/harassment exists in tech, I don't believe it's a valid argument for why there is a gender gap.

Male and female actors rarely compete for the same roles. Many other jobs in the entertainment industry are dominated by men. Orchestras used to be, but blind auditions made them more balanced. Just pointing to the entertainment industry doesn't disprove a connection between sexism and gender imbalance.

Re: You Can't Solve the Gender Gap in Tech If You Don't Understand Why It Exists

#24

Post by curtis »

bassman9000 wrote: post #22
curtis wrote: post #20

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Not all girls want to code, and not all girls want to take a STEM path, and that should not be see as some failure. It's also true that not all boys want to code, and not all boys want to take a STEM path. But what if a larger percentage of boys want to code or take a STEM path? If this were so, it would look like a pipeline problem, and it would look like a pipeline problem that's quite hard to fix. It might actua…

But what if a larger percentage of boys want to code or take a STEM path? If this were so, it would look like a pipeline problem, and it would look like a pipeline problem that's quite hard to fix. It might actually look like the reality we currently see. Why is that a problem? Why is it something to fix? Why do we want to achieve perfect 50% ratios on people's motivations and desires? edit: typo

> Why is that a problem? Why is it something to fix? Why do we want to achieve perfect 50% ratios on people's motivations and desires?

I personally don't think it's a problem. The disparity in computer science is so big that it does, at least, deserve an explanation, however.

Re: You Can't Solve the Gender Gap in Tech If You Don't Understand Why It Exists

#25

Post by joelhoffman »

pseudalopex wrote: post #21
eloisius wrote: post #9

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Not sure what you're saying, but it sounds like we're kind of agreeing, maybe? It just seems pointless to urge that we quit using tired tropes to solve a problem, but then immediately invoke another trope to make your point. Are men coding alone in their basements really the problem?

Calling out a stereotype is not invoking it.

The article claims that prospective girls see "men in hoodies coding alone in their basements" as role models. That's obviously not an accurate view of software engineering but is it really the view that teenagers have? If so, that's a real problem.

Re: You Can't Solve the Gender Gap in Tech If You Don't Understand Why It Exists

#27

Post by sleepysysadmin »

hopler wrote: post #3

Gender gap isn't a problem to solve. It may be a symptom of many things, such as harrassment, discouragement, discrimination, or environmental biases that make women less comfortable than men. Gender gap is smoke, go find fires the need to be put out, and solve those. Otherwise you'll slam into a wall because the "optimal" ratio does not exist and has no consensus, but specific harmful behaviors and and systems are i…

I think you misunderstand the purpose behind those pushing the gender wage gap narrative. Virtually everyone realizes the reality of why the gender wage gap exists and how it's not because of harassment, discouragement, discrimination, or environmental biases. That includes the people who are pushing the narrative. They aren't stupid, they know they are wrong.

Instead they have a different goal. They are collectivists. Their goal is that everyone gets paid exactly the same regardless of what job they do. They want a university professor to be paid the same as an elementary teacher.

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19304671

I'm not even joking.

Their goal is Marxism/Communism/Socialism. You can't argue with them that a professor should be paid more because of education and skills; because they dont consider those as reasons to be paid more or less.

Re: You Can't Solve the Gender Gap in Tech If You Don't Understand Why It Exists

#28

Post by sleepysysadmin »

candiodari wrote: post #17

I sometimes wonder if the problem isn't exactly the opposite of what people think they are. Women are underrepresented in tech because they get more support, not less. More choices, and they get pushed to go for the truly glamorous choices. What is glamorous in middle school and high school ? Well, the jobs the people "in power" at such institutions have, and in their own families. So Mom's job (the carer's job, beca…

>I sometimes wonder if the problem isn't exactly the opposite of what people think they are. Women are underrepresented in tech because they get more support, not less. More choices, and they get pushed to go for the truly glamorous choices.

This is actually an interesting point and I haven't been able to find information about it.

Lets say we have X amount of women who are going into STEM... but say for example I used to live in the Detroit area. The universities at the time I was about to head into post-secondary were offering 'scholarships' where women who took their first year in engineering, would get the rest of their education for free and most of the engineering credits would act as wildcard credits toward any other degree if they chose to switch.

So perhaps we lack women in IT because they went to engineering instead?

Re: You Can't Solve the Gender Gap in Tech If You Don't Understand Why It Exists

#29

Post by braindouche »

candiodari wrote: post #17

I sometimes wonder if the problem isn't exactly the opposite of what people think they are. Women are underrepresented in tech because they get more support, not less. More choices, and they get pushed to go for the truly glamorous choices. What is glamorous in middle school and high school ? Well, the jobs the people "in power" at such institutions have, and in their own families. So Mom's job (the carer's job, beca…

>I sometimes wonder if the problem isn't exactly the opposite of what people think they are. Women are underrepresented in tech because they get more support, not less. More choices, and they get pushed to go for the truly glamorous choices.

There might be something to this. I've anecdotally read somewhere that there are now more women in med school and law school than men. If that's true, and women are over-represented in even higher-echelon pipelines, are they funneling women away from comp sci? It's not the solution, certainly, but the answer to that question might be interesting.

Re: You Can't Solve the Gender Gap in Tech If You Don't Understand Why It Exists

#30

Post by octokatt »

eloisius wrote: post #9
octokatt wrote: post #6

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yes. Because the focus of the article is about how the gender gap/discrimination in tech issue is nuanced, and the other is literally talking about default stereotypes in tech and how they are damaging. Literally, the article invoked a stereotype, because the overwhelmingly common stereotype is damaging.

Not sure what you're saying, but it sounds like we're kind of agreeing, maybe? It just seems pointless to urge that we quit using tired tropes to solve a problem, but then immediately invoke another trope to make your point. Are men coding alone in their basements really the problem?

Probably agreeing, yes.

The problem here was me hearing what sounded like a knee-jerk-y reply to commenting on a stereotype, which usually means the conversation will descend into a horror pit. Language and behavioral conditioning does weird things.

Post reply on HN