Worst gadget ever? Ars reviews a $99 Android tablet
11–20 of 93 posts
Re: Worst gadget ever? Ars reviews a $99 Android tablet
#12“All in all, a disastrous piece of gadgetry.” http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/thereporters/rorycellanjones/2010...
“If this were a car it would be roughly in the category of a Robin Reliant from a couple of decades ago.” http://www.pda-247.com/wordpress/2010/10/next-10”-tablet-rev...
A common concern is that these products will damage the reputation of Android as a platform, and I suspect that’s true.
Re: Worst gadget ever? Ars reviews a $99 Android tablet
#13I'd guess there were similar reviews of Altair 8800 in 1975/76 ;-)
Re: Worst gadget ever? Ars reviews a $99 Android tablet
#14Re: Worst gadget ever? Ars reviews a $99 Android tablet
#15I learned about the Nook Color over the weekend. It has the potential to be a really good Android tablet ($249, 800MHz A8, 8GB storage). Only thing is that it's restricted to running apps approved by B&N, and it's running 2.1.
Re: Worst gadget ever? Ars reviews a $99 Android tablet
#16Re: Worst gadget ever? Ars reviews a $99 Android tablet
#17Re: Worst gadget ever? Ars reviews a $99 Android tablet
#18I pity all the uninformed consumers who buy this, or even worse, people who receive this as a gift from those uninformed consumers...
Re: Worst gadget ever? Ars reviews a $99 Android tablet
#19Re: Worst gadget ever? Ars reviews a $99 Android tablet
#20I'd almost be interested in getting one to be an internet radio gadget. But that's about it.