Excuse my ignorance. SF doesn't look anywhere like Hong Kong, possibly the most crowed places on earth, and it is not close to Tokyo or Seoul. It has plenty of Spaces, for many coming from Asia, most part of SF is like country side so to speak. What cant there be more housing development on the edge of SF, or taller building with many smaller apartments etc. Underground packing lot? Edit: Ok, is it because it is in a…
San Francisco median one bedroom apartment rent hits a new peak of $3,690
61–70 of 195 posts
Re: San Francisco median one bedroom apartment rent hits a new peak of $3,690
#62Excuse my ignorance. SF doesn't look anywhere like Hong Kong, possibly the most crowed places on earth, and it is not close to Tokyo or Seoul. It has plenty of Spaces, for many coming from Asia, most part of SF is like country side so to speak. What cant there be more housing development on the edge of SF, or taller building with many smaller apartments etc. Underground packing lot? Edit: Ok, is it because it is in a…
Re: San Francisco median one bedroom apartment rent hits a new peak of $3,690
#63Note that Zumper is not a reliable source for median rent data. CityObservatory wrote an article about their data problems a few years ago [1]. Zumper's data is, of course, based on apartments that are for rent and doesn't include currently occupied units. That alone skews high, especially when there is a lot of higher-rent new construction hitting the market. Also, it looks like Zumper's data skews towards higher-en…
I guess it depends on what question you're asking. You seem to be pointing out that you think the real question is: "what is the median rent for anyone living in San Francisco?" whereas Zumper seems to be more answering the question: "if someone moved to San Francisco today, and has zero connections, what rent would they pay?" Both are valid questions, but I think it's good to set the context for if you're having a c…
Re: San Francisco median one bedroom apartment rent hits a new peak of $3,690
#64"The federal Department of Housing and Urban Development said last year that a family of four earning up to $118,400 qualified as "low income" in the city. " For comparison, in NYC, it's $83,450.
Re: San Francisco median one bedroom apartment rent hits a new peak of $3,690
#65It's an existential issue. "Peter Thiel: The vast majority of the capital I give companies is just going to landlords" [1] [1] https://finance.yahoo.com/news/peter-thiel-vast-majority-cap...
He could try giving capital to companies in other locations. Rent in Berlin in less than a third of what you pay in SF.
Thiel in particular is German and has made some particularly scathing comments about the German startup scene (to the German press).
Re: San Francisco median one bedroom apartment rent hits a new peak of $3,690
#66When headhunters contact me about SF (or even Bay Area) jobs, I just scoff and shut them down. If you're fresh out of school, no family, and willing to live in a hovel for some interesting life experience, sure. But if you're an adult, it's no way to live. And putting kids through it is frankly unethical.
Re: San Francisco median one bedroom apartment rent hits a new peak of $3,690
#67Note that Zumper is not a reliable source for median rent data. CityObservatory wrote an article about their data problems a few years ago [1]. Zumper's data is, of course, based on apartments that are for rent and doesn't include currently occupied units. That alone skews high, especially when there is a lot of higher-rent new construction hitting the market. Also, it looks like Zumper's data skews towards higher-en…
I guess it depends on what question you're asking. You seem to be pointing out that you think the real question is: "what is the median rent for anyone living in San Francisco?" whereas Zumper seems to be more answering the question: "if someone moved to San Francisco today, and has zero connections, what rent would they pay?" Both are valid questions, but I think it's good to set the context for if you're having a c…
Re: San Francisco median one bedroom apartment rent hits a new peak of $3,690
#68I just visited New York on an extended trip. Most of NYC is better connected, more vibrant, more concerts, more sports, more universities, more housing, more international people, more business activity. Yet, NYC is affordable with a "functioning" commute system. People on all spectrum of income can live there. SF bay area has none of all that and yet is super expensive wasteland of suburbia. SF city is better but no…
Re: San Francisco median one bedroom apartment rent hits a new peak of $3,690
#69Earlier quoted context omitted.
And actual culture.
To the downvoters: I moved to SF/BA 3 years ago after living 8 years in Paris (France) and before that 20 years in St. Petersburg (Russia). There is noticeably more culture and diversity in both Paris and SPb than in SF/BA.
Re: San Francisco median one bedroom apartment rent hits a new peak of $3,690
#70Excuse my ignorance. SF doesn't look anywhere like Hong Kong, possibly the most crowed places on earth, and it is not close to Tokyo or Seoul. It has plenty of Spaces, for many coming from Asia, most part of SF is like country side so to speak. What cant there be more housing development on the edge of SF, or taller building with many smaller apartments etc. Underground packing lot? Edit: Ok, is it because it is in a…