HN-like math research discussion for Ph.D.s
1–10 of 122 posts
Re: HN-like math research discussion for Ph.D.s
#2Does this support $\LaTeX$ code in the titles and comments?
Re: HN-like math research discussion for Ph.D.s
#3Does this support $\LaTeX$ code in the titles and comments?
Yes
Re: HN-like math research discussion for Ph.D.s
#4Does this support $\LaTeX$ code in the titles and comments?
looks like it does
Re: HN-like math research discussion for Ph.D.s
#5What does sth like this need 'leaders' (i.e. rankings) for? Isn't it exactly the lack of such rankings that makes HN so nice?
Re: HN-like math research discussion for Ph.D.s
#6What else is there? Is there an equivalent for CS research?
Re: HN-like math research discussion for Ph.D.s
#7What does sth like this need 'leaders' (i.e. rankings) for? Isn't it exactly the lack of such rankings that makes HN so nice?
If you click on lists on the footer, you will see a leaderboard
Re: HN-like math research discussion for Ph.D.s
#8What else is there? Is there an equivalent for CS research?
ML research falls into stat which is covered by the site. Other CS coverage is on the way
Re: HN-like math research discussion for Ph.D.s
#9Cool, how is it implemented ? Did you customize the news app from the arc repository or have you implemented it from scratch ?
Re: HN-like math research discussion for Ph.D.s
#10This feels a bit overly specialised, and the average article is hard. I’m sure a maths researcher can handle it and all but it does seem rather taxing.
I think for something like HN to be broadly interesting it needs volume and variety, because people’s interests are a long tail phenomena. I imagine that is probably true for maths too.