Live data from Hacker News

Berlin Builds Ideas to Stage a Housing Revolution

citylab.com

11–20 of 194 posts

Re: Berlin Builds Ideas to Stage a Housing Revolution

#12
post #6
post #2

Nope, because they'll just setup a load of shell companies.

I always wondered if there might be some way to write a law that essentially bans clever financial tricks.

There is, but the trend in US (and UK) law has unfortunately gone down a path that makes this very difficult. The letter of the law is given great weight, no matter the intention of the law.

For example, in tax law, the game is to find ways to not actually violate the exact letter of the law. The idea of the spirit of the law has no force; everything has to be precisely outlawed. This, of course, is an infinite game that will never end, and leads to the endless games of shell companies and foreign domiciling and so on and so on; everyone knows that this is not what was intended, but it's what we have.

The alternative is to write into law the intentions of the law, and allow subsequent assessment and judgement. Some places do this, and in this way the game of finding ways to ever so slightly dodge the exact wording of the law is a much less fruitful game.

Re: Berlin Builds Ideas to Stage a Housing Revolution

#13
There is no need to put a hard limit, just an effective limit by having a general wealth tax. Money flows to where money already is, that's inevitable in a capitalist market economy. There's no need to change that, but progressively bigger piles of wealth should be progressively higher taxed to keep them in check, thus ensuring a competitive market.

Edit: I guess I should have known mentioning wealth tax would get people nervous. But this is not about taxing your old grandma for her paid-off house. This is about small but increasing percentage, starting at maybe $1M-10M and really kicking in at $1B and above. You can then abolish dividend taxing (that's only fair) and perhaps income tax altogether.

Re: Berlin Builds Ideas to Stage a Housing Revolution

#14
There is a certain je-ne-sais-qoui about people living on the Karl Marx Allee trying to stop a rich person from buying their homes.

From what I see though, the issue that started this is not that there are people controlling too much property, but there is a group of asshole landlords that use loopholes to increase the rent way to steeply.

Re: Berlin Builds Ideas to Stage a Housing Revolution

#15
I do not think this implementation is a good use of taxpayer money or government effort.

  has developed a reputation for raising rents sharply by finding loopholes in Germany’s fairly strict rental laws.
This is the item the government should rightfully be attempting to fix. Not acting as a market participant.

  In the meantime, the firm invests almost half as much as state housing companies do to keep its homes in good condition.
State actors regularly spend 2x-3x their private counterparts with the same results. The difference relates to additional studies and more onerous self-imposed tendering requirements that create no additional value for the end user but allow the state to feel it has made decisions and spent taxpayer money in a justifiable way.

Re: Berlin Builds Ideas to Stage a Housing Revolution

#16

Regulate behaviour, not ownership. If you want landlords to behave better, then rather than keeping them small, stick limits on what they can do.

You can only regulate what you can measure. Ownership is very easy to measure. And tax progressively.

Re: Berlin Builds Ideas to Stage a Housing Revolution

#17
Everyone and their cat wants to live as close as humanly possible to the hip center of the hip city. But of course, they literally do not want to pay the price. Why is there a vegan bakery specialized in Afghan Bagel[1] around the corner? Because there are enough hip, young professionals to pay for even the most unlikely specialty. Business can afford to cater to the most extraordinary taste, but only because there are so many fluent customers. These customers then simply drive prices.

Due to the limits of public transportation, there are basically three ways out of this situation:

1. Rent ever-smaller, modernized apartments 2. Move away from the center 3. Get out of the city altogether

Modern urbanites will not pick any of these options. They want cheap, large apartments with basically no insulation and 4m high ceilings. They do not want to travel more than 10min with the subway. And the thought of leaving Berlin borders on a crime against humanity. Now add to that the part of the population that lives in the center of the city for decades and literally cannot move anymore and you have a really bad situation at hands.

IMO, it is ironic how the modern urban population that is so quick to assign blame for climate change (to car owners, carnivores), social injustice (to white men, preferably older), or simply a lack of mobile network coverage fails to understand their own contribution to the problems of a modern city.

Sorry, but I needed to vent that.

[1] Exaggeration. I don't even know if there are/were any Jews in Afghanistan, but I like good Bagel.

Re: Berlin Builds Ideas to Stage a Housing Revolution

#18
post #6
post #2

Nope, because they'll just setup a load of shell companies.

I always wondered if there might be some way to write a law that essentially bans clever financial tricks.

There are plenty of laws that are specified in such a way that no matter how you structure your shell companies they still apply. The only way to truely get around that is to start having strawmen owners or unregistered ownership relationships, all of which will get you in trouble with the law.

Re: Berlin Builds Ideas to Stage a Housing Revolution

#20
post #9

The truth is that rents in Berlin are exceptionally cheap compared to other major cities. Try finding a flat in London or Paris for The only way to keep rents this low in the face of rising demand is public housing that is rented out below market rates to low income tenants, or via a lottery.

Or just a have a free market and abolish building codes.
Post reply on HN