Major survey finds worms are rare or absent in 20% of fields in England
1–10 of 110 posts
Re: Major survey finds worms are rare or absent in 20% of fields in England
#2The title presumably should say 40%
Re: Major survey finds worms are rare or absent in 20% of fields in England
#3pesticides, copper levels, phreatic level, number and species of hammerhead flatworms...
Re: Major survey finds worms are rare or absent in 20% of fields in England
#4Re: Major survey finds worms are rare or absent in 20% of fields in England
#5> has shown they are rare or absent in two out of five fields The title presumably should say 40%
Re: Major survey finds worms are rare or absent in 20% of fields in England
#6Re: Major survey finds worms are rare or absent in 20% of fields in England
#7Without more context the study is not very useful pesticides, copper levels, phreatic level, number and species of hammerhead flatworms...
Then I realized that I'd misread worms as women in the title.
Re: Major survey finds worms are rare or absent in 20% of fields in England
#8Without more context the study is not very useful pesticides, copper levels, phreatic level, number and species of hammerhead flatworms...
Re: Major survey finds worms are rare or absent in 20% of fields in England
#9> has shown they are rare or absent in two out of five fields The title presumably should say 40%
Or is it 1 out of 5 fields? Big difference!
> However, 42% of fields had poor earthworm biodiversity – meaning either very few or none of the surface-dwelling and deep-burrowing categorisations of worms were seen.
Re: Major survey finds worms are rare or absent in 20% of fields in England
#10> has shown they are rare or absent in two out of five fields The title presumably should say 40%