Live data from Hacker News

Ghidra

nsa.gov

1–10 of 60 posts

Re: Ghidra

#5
My brother is into reverse engineering, he is literally counting the days to the open source release of this.

He said there isn't anything quite like it as it can actually stand toe-to-toe with IDA Pro, the commercial software that apparently nothing yet can really beat.

Re: Ghidra

#7
Can't wait to try it and read articles comparing its features with IDA, Binary Ninja, radare2 or Hopper. Sounds really interesting!

Re: Ghidra

#8
post #4

Uhh, what's this about? https://i.imgur.com/e3kNYTH.png

Link, in case someone wants to dig further. https://nsa.dod.afpims.mil/

I get:

> You cannot visit nsa.dod.afpims.mil at the moment because the website sent scrambled credentials that Google Chrome cannot process. Network errors and attacks are usually temporary, so this page will probably work later.

Re: Ghidra

#9
On a sidenote, looking at their Github, they publish a lot of names / emails in the git logs (~100). Some are encoded / anonymous, but most are real looking names and plausible email addresses.

Re: Ghidra

#10
post #5

My brother is into reverse engineering, he is literally counting the days to the open source release of this. He said there isn't anything quite like it as it can actually stand toe-to-toe with IDA Pro, the commercial software that apparently nothing yet can really beat.

Yup. IDA Pro is the gold standard, and was basically the only choice for a long time. It's also stupidly expensive and priced for defense contractor funny money, with an individual license nearly $3000 [0]. Most freelancers just use a cracked copy or the freeware version.

Recently Hopper and BinaryNinja have been rising in use, with much more affordable pricing plans, but they're still second-rate as far as I know.

(There's also radare2, which for all it's mentioned occasionally I don't actually know anyone that uses it)

0: https://www.hex-rays.com/cgi-bin/quote.cgi

Post reply on HN