I'm curious how the algorithm works, as it doesn't seem to work as I'd expected. My first thought was to go back and look at the day I launched my startup with at Show HN [1], which got over 700 points and was at #1 from roughly noon to 2 AM the next day (PT). Sure enough, this post shows up in the #2 slot on the day I posted it (Sept 5, 2013) [2], but it doesn't show up at all on the following day [3]. This is stran…
We only started logging the front page on 2014-11-11. For days before that, what you're seeing is the stories which were submitted on that day, ordered by vote score. (Not necessarily publicly visible points, though, because some votes get dropped for various reasons.) Since your story was submitted on Sept 5, 2013, that's the day it shows up. If you look at https://news.ycombinator.com/front?day=2014-11-11 vs. https…
New ‘past’ link on HN front page
181–190 of 191 posts
Re: New ‘past’ link on HN front page
#182Not new; just the link at the top is new. The hard part was what to call it. Since the point is to give people more to read, 'more' seemed right. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12073675 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=18512028 Edit: Oh, also: "more" fits with the "More" links you see at the bottom of the front page and other places, clicking which takes you back to previous posts. Edit 2: Ok, you guys have…
Re: New ‘past’ link on HN front page
#183Earlier quoted context omitted.
Yeaaaaah but it was on topic, in a chain of threads making fun how unsubstantive people’s skepticism was back in 2010 Your team tells me that upvotes/downvotes are noisy, but once you have downvotes it is unsubstantive and the account is rate limited Pick Your team also never explains how you mods interpret a guideline or substantiation, just unilaterally say it violates and pray for classical conditioning as if you…
I'm happy to explain how we interpret specific cases, but not as part of a litigious process in which explanation only leads to more objections. If you want a serious answer, you'll need to do more to establish good faith.
Such as Karma over 1,000? What do you mean
I think I’m doing pretty good, but what do you have in mind
Re: New ‘past’ link on HN front page
#184It'd be nice if the "title" field of the link submit form would have a tiny little bit of javascript to count how many characters are in the field.
It does if you go over 80, which is the limit. Does that not suffice?
Re: New ‘past’ link on HN front page
#185I'm actually really interested in this addition. I'm just going back to 'big' days, such as financial crash. When I started HS when I finished HS, when I started College. A few articles are interesting, it's definitely better than bumbling around Algolia. Edit: One great link is this one > Google Making Extraordinary Counteroffers To Stop Flow Of Employees To Facebook [1] [1]( https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=165…
>>no reason their stock won’t hit $100 billion in total valuation over the next couple of years. >That's got to be a joke. Love it!
Worth remembering these little snippets of history next time someone pooh-poohs your idea.
Re: New ‘past’ link on HN front page
#186Earlier quoted context omitted.
“Days”?
I like it. But it seems to default to today's date with options to readily explore "this date in history." So I will suggest: Date Alternately, I will suggest Top since it defaults to Stories from (today's date), ordered by how long they were on the front page. Hopefully if enough people toss out suggestions, one will turn out to be a real improvement over more. Maybe Explore ?
Re: New ‘past’ link on HN front page
#187Not new; just the link at the top is new. The hard part was what to call it. Since the point is to give people more to read, 'more' seemed right. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12073675 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=18512028 Edit: Oh, also: "more" fits with the "More" links you see at the bottom of the front page and other places, clicking which takes you back to previous posts. Edit 2: Ok, you guys have…
Re: New ‘past’ link on HN front page
#188Earlier quoted context omitted.
I'm happy to explain how we interpret specific cases, but not as part of a litigious process in which explanation only leads to more objections. If you want a serious answer, you'll need to do more to establish good faith.
> If you want a serious answer, you'll need to do more to establish good faith. Such as Karma over 1,000? What do you mean I think I’m doing pretty good, but what do you have in mind
If you don't want to be banned, you're welcome to email hn@ycombinator.com and give us reason to believe that you'll follow the rules in the future.
Re: New ‘past’ link on HN front page
#189Re: New ‘past’ link on HN front page
#190Interesting!! Very first day of HN has 10 posts. https://news.ycombinator.com/front?day=2007-02-18
Isn't this the first day? https://news.ycombinator.com/front?day=2006-10-09