Live data from Hacker News

Sam Altman: Bay Area is no longer the obvious place for startups

twitter.com

31–40 of 263 posts

Re: Sam Altman: Bay Area is no longer the obvious place for startups

#31
post #27

I see that myself. And I mean this as absolutely no offense to anyone in the area. I've met incredibly intelligent people there, among the best. Though, I believe the very best are distributed throughout the world, and command the ability not to move. All that said, first, well, the silicon part is all but gone. I find the signal to noise ratio pretty low. For every 10x developer, there are 50 people who did a bootca…

That is only one aspect and I think a minor one. What made silicon valley is access to capital, proximity to stanford and a feedback loop of successful entrepreneurs using their experience to create the next generation of successful entrepreneurs

Re: Sam Altman: Bay Area is no longer the obvious place for startups

#33

I suspect the VC industry itself will be disrupted at some point (the irony of the VC industry is that the biz model has remained basically the same for 50 years when everything else has changed). It will become incrementally easier to raise money from non-traditional sources at better terms as "accredited investor" laws are relaxed e.g. through a Security Token Offering.

[deleted]

Re: Sam Altman: Bay Area is no longer the obvious place for startups

#35

I just spent the week in San Jose and I marveled at the ocean of vacant office space. I find it hard to believe that Sam is only now coming to this conclusion.

That’s weird: what disincentives offset the cheaper cost of commercial space?

Re: Sam Altman: Bay Area is no longer the obvious place for startups

#37

And 50% of people living in SF want to leave https://sf.curbed.com/2019/2/20/18233498/poll-2019-leaving-s...

Then why dont they? Or are there 2 people willing to take the place of every person leaving?

Yea

Re: Sam Altman: Bay Area is no longer the obvious place for startups

#38
post #28

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I agree, but quite a few people get lonely working remotely and not having a proper office to go into, and software won't solve that (at least not until VR presence or something of the sort is really good). I've managed great engineers who have complained about this and I haven't seen a good solution.

A coworking space stipend perhaps?

This works if your remote team members live close to each other. Which is possible for some teams but doesn’t apply universally

Re: Sam Altman: Bay Area is no longer the obvious place for startups

#39
post #28
post #10

I see a bright future for products and services focused on remote team management

I agree, but quite a few people get lonely working remotely and not having a proper office to go into, and software won't solve that (at least not until VR presence or something of the sort is really good). I've managed great engineers who have complained about this and I haven't seen a good solution.

I'm happy with my current setup. I live about an hour away from a satellite office. I go in once or twice a week by train. It's enough to get me out of the house and keep my face fresh with my coworkers but not so much that it's a burden. I fly to HQ every month or two for similar reasons.

Re: Sam Altman: Bay Area is no longer the obvious place for startups

#40

And 50% of people living in SF want to leave https://sf.curbed.com/2019/2/20/18233498/poll-2019-leaving-s...

Then why dont they? Or are there 2 people willing to take the place of every person leaving?

People leave all the time...especially anyone who is late 20s/early 30s knows plenty of friends who move out.
Post reply on HN