COI – Chat Over IMAP
coi-dev.org
COI – Chat Over IMAP
1–10 of 259 posts
Re: COI – Chat Over IMAP
#2Re: COI – Chat Over IMAP
#3Are Google, Apple, Microsoft, and other large email providers likely to implement a protocol like this into their own servers? It seems like a major conflict of interest, and without them it is a massive portion of the market that will never see this service work.
Re: COI – Chat Over IMAP
#4Are Google, Apple, Microsoft, and other large email providers likely to implement a protocol like this into their own servers? It seems like a major conflict of interest, and without them it is a massive portion of the market that will never see this service work.
just on the homepage "Since this is all based on email, you can communicate with users even when they do not have COI-compatible servers or apps."
the likely side effect is that you'd need to filter out chats messages into a folder or something to reduce the inbox clutter
Re: COI – Chat Over IMAP
#5Are Google, Apple, Microsoft, and other large email providers likely to implement a protocol like this into their own servers? It seems like a major conflict of interest, and without them it is a massive portion of the market that will never see this service work.
Re: COI – Chat Over IMAP
#6Are Google, Apple, Microsoft, and other large email providers likely to implement a protocol like this into their own servers? It seems like a major conflict of interest, and without them it is a massive portion of the market that will never see this service work.
Are server-side changes needed?
> COI works with all email severs, but IMAP servers can be enhanced with extra COI capability.
I’d take this to mean that no, changes are not explicitly required; but without the changes COI functions the same as email, but in an IM interface.
Re: COI – Chat Over IMAP
#7Re: COI – Chat Over IMAP
#8Re: COI – Chat Over IMAP
#9Re: COI – Chat Over IMAP
#10The fact I had to read quite so far down the page to find this snippet emphasises to me how unimportant the developers of this protocol see E2E encryption to be :( And leaving it to the client seems like a terrible idea, especially if there are options, as then surely it will depend on what E2E encryption options your and your recipient's clients supports?