The weight, which I am assuming is going to be around twice as much as a normal phone, will be a huge turnoff for most people. And unlike a normal phone you won't be able to use a pop-socket to help holding it or likely even a case for protection when it falls.
Samsung’s Foldable Phone Is the $1,980 Galaxy Fold
61–70 of 204 posts
Re: Samsung’s Foldable Phone Is the $1,980 Galaxy Fold
#62Earlier quoted context omitted.
I want a phone that I can read books on, and spend quality time with, rather than reading crappy stuff like Twitter. I fully expect to buy a foldable (not sure which one) and would easily pay $2500+ for it. (It's not like I can buy laptops any more, since those are all garbage even when I pay $4000 for a supposedly high-end system, so I certainly have spare device money laying around!)
Apple's phones are now faster than their laptops. I think it makes sense to have a folding computer, especially now that we have screen tech that enables it.
Kind of like how a plane is faster than a car. You're trading off some flexibility for that added speed.
Re: Samsung’s Foldable Phone Is the $1,980 Galaxy Fold
#63I also wonder if there ends up being a note version and how well that works with the stylus. All in all its a pretty fascinating device.
Re: Samsung’s Foldable Phone Is the $1,980 Galaxy Fold
#64There are 3 numbers with programs - 0, 1, and infinity (or, more pragmatically, "run out of memory"). Programs that have arbitrary limits like "3" are just wrong.
It's like the filename length limitations in operating systems. No matter how long they are, they are arbitrary and somebody overflows them. The real limit should be the size of the disk drive.
Re: Samsung’s Foldable Phone Is the $1,980 Galaxy Fold
#65Earlier quoted context omitted.
I find it hard to believe that this ~7“ device with a strange aspect ratio and without a foldable keyboard can replace a $1100 tablet like a Surface Pro or a 12.9“ iPad Pro.
No, probably not, but it could quite plausibly replace an iPad Mini. I could see even replacing a midsize tablet, for someone for whom that amount of bulk elimination merits a compromise.
Re: Samsung’s Foldable Phone Is the $1,980 Galaxy Fold
#66Slightly OT: IMHO, I think Samsung made a huge mistake announcing the Fold along with their other products. 1 - This is a new product category and I think it deserves its own stage. 2 - Fold is overshadowing everything else Samsung announced. Galaxy, etc. are their biggest sellers but they lost the main attention to the Fold. Basically Fold's hype will cannibalize market attention of their new announcement that will…
Re: Samsung’s Foldable Phone Is the $1,980 Galaxy Fold
#67Re: Samsung’s Foldable Phone Is the $1,980 Galaxy Fold
#68Earlier quoted context omitted.
Apple's phones are now faster than their laptops. I think it makes sense to have a folding computer, especially now that we have screen tech that enables it.
*For very limited workloads - And those synthetic geekbench scores don't really count
The real bottleneck is UI, not CPU's.
Re: Samsung’s Foldable Phone Is the $1,980 Galaxy Fold
#69Earlier quoted context omitted.
No, probably not, but it could quite plausibly replace an iPad Mini. I could see even replacing a midsize tablet, for someone for whom that amount of bulk elimination merits a compromise.
At around 4x the price? It's not replacing anything.
Re: Samsung’s Foldable Phone Is the $1,980 Galaxy Fold
#70Earlier quoted context omitted.
Kindles are cheap and light, if digital reading is your goal.
I often read PDF versions of books (especially technical books) or PDFs of academic papers etc I've never been able to view these properly on a kindle. Well, last time I tried anyway, is it better now?