Jesus christ I sure hope it doesn't
This Cat Does Not Exist
121–130 of 189 posts
Re: This Cat Does Not Exist
#122Earlier quoted context omitted.
They look like Star Trek transporter accidents.
That could mean a lot of things. Are you saying that they look dead, fused with another cat, drastically younger, attacked by an interdimensional monster, cloned or are the evil alternate reality version of themselves?
Fused with a human in some cases, so very much like "The Fly" sometimes: https://imgur.com/a/usixtLS
Re: This Cat Does Not Exist
#123Cute idea, but about half of these have given me very weird/unrealistic results. For instance this[1] one which, while amusing as hell, isn't exactly convincing. https://i.imgur.com/g5bHmH6.png
Oh, the elusive myhological doughnut cat. Finally confirmed!
Re: This Cat Does Not Exist
#124Earlier quoted context omitted.
Fun fact, the toroidal cat is actually a stable gravitational configuration along with a spheroid. There are upper and lower bounds on angular momentum and mass of course, but within those bounds you can have a toroidal cat orbiting its primary! Wait, what’s a cat again?
isn't that the same type of cat physicists used to proof the buttered-cat paradox ?
Actually the buttered cat hypothesis has been proven with much less exotic cat shapes. I recall seeing a paper showing that a cat with dimension n=1 and zero rotational inertia would spontaneously begin spinning as a result of the presence of a "butter field." Of course the experimenters ran out of point cats and had to go to the store to get more syrup shortly after completing the experiment, so it has been rather difficult to replicate. However the authors assured readers they would attempt replication at the next breakfast fundraiser for the department.
Re: This Cat Does Not Exist
#125Personally, I'm excited for https://thisjavascriptframeworkdoesnotexist.com
if we are throwing crazy ideas: https://thismultibilliondollarstartupdoesnotexist.com
It's already been done:
Re: This Cat Does Not Exist
#126Earlier quoted context omitted.
Complete nightmare fuel. https://imgur.com/a/D4sRn5F
I raise you https://imgur.com/tNlpOd4
The cats aren't so bad.
It's the "people".
Re: This Cat Does Not Exist
#127Looks at cat
Sees title
«Obviously»
Re: This Cat Does Not Exist
#128Earlier quoted context omitted.
I also got a few characters of would-be-text into a couple of images. As you said, the net was probably trained with images that included cat memes and it "learned" that meme-text means "cat".
Makes me wonder if it is possible for deep learning to create an artificial language. Supposedly Lojban's vocabulary was created by an algorithm, although how it got "mlatu" for cat is obscure.
Here's how Lojban's vocabulary was created: https://lojban.github.io/cll/4/14/
> At least one word was found in each of the six source languages (Chinese, English, Hindi, Spanish, Russian, Arabic) corresponding to the proposed gismu. This word was rendered into Lojban phonetics rather liberally: consonant clusters consisting of a stop and the corresponding fricative were simplified to just the fricative (“tc” became “c”, “dj” became “j”) and non-Lojban vowels were mapped onto Lojban ones. Furthermore, morphological endings were dropped. The same mapping rules were applied to all six languages for the sake of consistency. > ...
Re: This Cat Does Not Exist
#129Well, at least after the human race is wiped out by AI, the fascination with cats will still live on in the new sentient creatures dominating the planet.
Re: This Cat Does Not Exist
#130I think this might be a well-done satire showcasing the pitfalls of having insufficient training data. It's magnificent. Half the cats are adorable and half are, I believe, creatures from "The Thing".
They look like Star Trek transporter accidents.
Reminds me of Alien Resurrection. The other Ripleys.