Earlier quoted context omitted.
While your second sentence is definitely true, I disagree with your first. Developing muscle strength is partially caused by training your nerves to better engage your muscle fibers; however, simply adding fibers aka raw muscle mass is the other main component of gaining strength. I would argue it's the predominant factor.
Adding fibres. i.e. adding cells is hyperplasia and it's currently unknown if this occurs naturally in adult humans. Most visible growth can be attributed to hypertrophy, where the cells grow bigger.
Muscle memory discovery ends 'use it or lose it' dogma
131–137 of 137 posts
Re: Muscle memory discovery ends 'use it or lose it' dogma
#132Earlier quoted context omitted.
Yea it's not good, we want to make sports as safe as we can.
No, I mean that participating on that sport will damage your health. Think back on all the talk about TBI in football. There are plenty of rough sports out there that people have no real problems with, because we haven't figured out how exactly it causes damage to your body. Even just weightlifting on a professional level seems to harm a person's body, but it's only visible once they become older. You can't easily cl…
Re: Muscle memory discovery ends 'use it or lose it' dogma
#133Are there any safe, easy to acquire steroids that I can use once so that I can gain the long term benefits?
Re: Muscle memory discovery ends 'use it or lose it' dogma
#134Earlier quoted context omitted.
>Closer to the risks of taking a medication than a street drug. Which street drugs? The comparison reminds of making the distinction between "natural" and "chemical" drugs. Sounds nice if you want to convey an image but not a sensible generalization. You will find quite a lot of street drugs that are less dangerous then some types of medication and vice versa.
Everything besides cannabis? The most prevalent street drugs besides cannabis are cocaine, heroin, ecstacy, and methamphetamine. All of those are quite a bit more dangerous than the average medicine you get prescribed by our doctor just because of addiction potential and inconsistent quality of the end product.
Unless you are talking about the purity of the product, i dont see a sensible case for the comparison of street drugs with pharmaceuticals.
Re: Muscle memory discovery ends 'use it or lose it' dogma
#135Earlier quoted context omitted.
lol they are illegal... they are banned for citizens by the government.
This is incorrect. What's banned (in many western countries) is distribution unless there is a medical prescription. But nothing prevents people from using them, same with other drugs like cocaine and heroine.
Re: Muscle memory discovery ends 'use it or lose it' dogma
#136Earlier quoted context omitted.
Which is exactly the definition of being "banned".
In my country at least I need a prescription from a doctor if I want to take antibiotics, does that mean they're banned here?
Re: Muscle memory discovery ends 'use it or lose it' dogma
#137Earlier quoted context omitted.
Look up Emsculpt. It's a fascinating/creepy new device that artificially stimulates core muscular contractions, with visibly more exercised and defined muscles after a few sessions with no changes in lifestyle.
I use my motor neurons to electrically stimulate muscle contraction and it doesn't cost me anything. I mean come on... the wires are already hooked up right in to your brain...