What Even Is a Number?
notebook.drmaciver.com
What Even Is a Number?
1–10 of 173 posts
Re: What Even Is a Number?
#2Counts of things are described here, but the greeks went to great lengths with geometry to discover numbers (and even killed people who came up with irrational answers)
Re: What Even Is a Number?
#3Was there ever a proposed type of number that is today not considered a number? Like i=squareroot(-1), was there ever an attempt to do math with something like y=1/0 or another illegal construct?
Re: What Even Is a Number?
#4> You can see some of that history of what we call some of the different sorts of numbers: e.g. Negative, irrational, and imaginary numbers. Each of these represents a bitter argument about whether a new type of number should be allowed, all of which were eventually won by the people on the side of the new numbers... Was there ever a proposed type of number that is today not considered a number? Like i=squareroot(-1)…
Wheels are a type of algebra where division by 0 is defined.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wheel_theory
https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/994508/wheel-theory...
To call wheels "obscure" is to make them out to be better-known than they are, however.
Re: What Even Is a Number?
#5Still, lovely article.
Re: What Even Is a Number?
#6> You can see some of that history of what we call some of the different sorts of numbers: e.g. Negative, irrational, and imaginary numbers. Each of these represents a bitter argument about whether a new type of number should be allowed, all of which were eventually won by the people on the side of the new numbers... Was there ever a proposed type of number that is today not considered a number? Like i=squareroot(-1)…
Re: What Even Is a Number?
#7Re: What Even Is a Number?
#8In case anyone just wants actual answers without reading pages and pages of prose, here is one set of constructions (there are other competitors too).
The natural 0 is the emptyset. The natural 1 is the singleton {0}. The natural 2 is {0,1}. In general, the natural n+1 is {0,...,n}. Exercise to the reader: define appropriate arithmetical functions on the naturals.
Define a relation ~ on pairs (a,b) of naturals by saying (a,b)~(c,d) if and only if b+c=a+d. Exercise to the reader: ~ is an equivalence relation. Its equivalence classes are called "integers". The equivalence class containing (a,b) represents the integer b-a. For example, the integer -1 is the equivalence class {(1,0),(2,1),(3,2),...}. Exercise: define appropriate arithmetical functions on the integers.
Define a relation ~ on pairs (m,n) (n nonzero) of integers by saying (m,n)~(p,q) if and only if mq=pn. Exercise: Show ~ is an equivalence relation. Its equivalence classes are called "rationals". The equivalence class containing (m,n) represents the rational m/n. For example, 1/2 is the equivalence class {(1,2),(-1,-2),(2,4),(-2,-4),...}={(k,2k) for all nonzero integers k}. Exercise: define arithmetic operations on the rationals.
To get from the rationals to the reals, see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dedekind_cut
Re: What Even Is a Number?
#9> You can see some of that history of what we call some of the different sorts of numbers: e.g. Negative, irrational, and imaginary numbers. Each of these represents a bitter argument about whether a new type of number should be allowed, all of which were eventually won by the people on the side of the new numbers... Was there ever a proposed type of number that is today not considered a number? Like i=squareroot(-1)…
Hamilton attempted a theory of triplets before setting on 4d quaternions, so that would be one example of a failed number system off the top of my head.
Re: What Even Is a Number?
#10OK, I said, show me a plain old "one". Nope, that's one fork; nope that's one ball; nope, you get the idea.
You cannot show just "one" unattached to anything else.
The concept of "one" is an idea. It only exists as a "real" concept in your mind because it exists as the same concept in the minds of others, and it's a very useful concept in describing the world around us.
This odd fact becomes ever more apparent when you find out about cultures that have very different approaches to quantitative reasoning, like the Pirahã in Brazil [1]. They don't have number words beyond "one", words roughly meaning "some" and "many" are used for anything more than one.
[1] https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2008/07/080714111940.h...