Live data from Hacker News

First .dev Domains Go Live

blog.google

1–10 of 227 posts

Re: First .dev Domains Go Live

#3
Slack and Github were so worried about someone cybersquatting that they were willing to pay $11,500 each to get those domains today? I guess that's the point of the Dutch auction system, but still seems like a waste of money.

Re: First .dev Domains Go Live

#4

Stupid expensive for what really?

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19179465 suggests it's an ICAAN rule to charge higher prices on initial offering.

444 comments a couple of days ago in "Google .dev domain early access" https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19178757

Re: First .dev Domains Go Live

#5
post #3

Slack and Github were so worried about someone cybersquatting that they were willing to pay $11,500 each to get those domains today? I guess that's the point of the Dutch auction system, but still seems like a waste of money.

The sunrise period for trademark owners was a whole month until today, with a much more reasonable price tag.

Re: First .dev Domains Go Live

#8
post #3

Slack and Github were so worried about someone cybersquatting that they were willing to pay $11,500 each to get those domains today? I guess that's the point of the Dutch auction system, but still seems like a waste of money.

For Microsoft (which owns GitHub) that is a tiny expense, but if they couldn't really afford it they could just file a dispute under UDRP.

Re: First .dev Domains Go Live

#9
post #5
post #3

Slack and Github were so worried about someone cybersquatting that they were willing to pay $11,500 each to get those domains today? I guess that's the point of the Dutch auction system, but still seems like a waste of money.

The sunrise period for trademark owners was a whole month until today, with a much more reasonable price tag.

That makes more sense. I had missed that there was a sunrise period for the .dev tld.
Post reply on HN