Live data from Hacker News

A faster, more efficient cryptocurrency

news.mit.edu

21–30 of 839 posts

Re: A faster, more efficient cryptocurrency

#21

Is data usage a big problem for Bitcoin?

It isn't even close to a big problem. Better design is great, but anyone who can watch youtube can still sync to any current cryptocurrency chain. Most people never will though, since there isn't much trust involved in using a chain on a server.

Re: A faster, more efficient cryptocurrency

#22

I have long wondered how cryptocurrency fans would answer the question: ‘Would you be happy if the crypto-utopia you bring up happens in the next 10 years, and all value is stored/transacted through a cryptocurrency, but it was a coin that you do not possess now, nor could you transfer any of you current currencies into it?’ Say tomorrow someone releases the one true coin, but no one notices. All other cryptocurrenci…

Great point, not to mention the fact that big banks and investment corporations have dabbled in existing crypto. Those big organizations are even less likely to support the one true coin you speak of.

Re: A faster, more efficient cryptocurrency

#23

I have long wondered how cryptocurrency fans would answer the question: ‘Would you be happy if the crypto-utopia you bring up happens in the next 10 years, and all value is stored/transacted through a cryptocurrency, but it was a coin that you do not possess now, nor could you transfer any of you current currencies into it?’ Say tomorrow someone releases the one true coin, but no one notices. All other cryptocurrenci…

Anyone who answers no isn't a fan of cryptocurrency; you're asking the wrong people. Those people are just fans of getting rich on the latest fad.

Those of us who have been here since the beginning just want cryptocurrency to succeed and flourish and fulfill its roles, and we already know Bitcoin won't be the answer so we're all waiting on The One True Coin.

Re: A faster, more efficient cryptocurrency

#24
post #6
post #3

Does this just reduce join bandwidth? If so it's a minor improvement since the real problems with scalability are transaction size and proof of work cost per TX.

> With traditional cryptocurrencies, users compete to solve equations that validate blocks, with the first to solve the equations receiving funds. As the network scales, this slows down transaction processing times. Algorand uses a “proof-of-stake” concept to more efficiently verify blocks and better enable new users join. For every block, a representative verification “committee” is selected. Users with more money —…

Ethereum is still planning the switch. They've combined proof of stake with sharding for scalability, and the combined system is being rolled out in three phases, the first of them this year. There's a complete spec for the first phase, and teams building implementations.

Re: A faster, more efficient cryptocurrency

#25

I have long wondered how cryptocurrency fans would answer the question: ‘Would you be happy if the crypto-utopia you bring up happens in the next 10 years, and all value is stored/transacted through a cryptocurrency, but it was a coin that you do not possess now, nor could you transfer any of you current currencies into it?’ Say tomorrow someone releases the one true coin, but no one notices. All other cryptocurrenci…

Exactly. Cryptocurrencies are a pipe dream unless they can be effectively and fairly distributed first.

Care to link those two unrelated concepts together a bit better?

Money isn't effectively and fairly distributed and it's obviously not a pipe dream.

Re: A faster, more efficient cryptocurrency

#26

I have long wondered how cryptocurrency fans would answer the question: ‘Would you be happy if the crypto-utopia you bring up happens in the next 10 years, and all value is stored/transacted through a cryptocurrency, but it was a coin that you do not possess now, nor could you transfer any of you current currencies into it?’ Say tomorrow someone releases the one true coin, but no one notices. All other cryptocurrenci…

Yes, and I'm heavily vested, mainly in ethereum. I would be bummed, don't get me wrong, but it would give me hope for us all to get along more internationally.

Re: A faster, more efficient cryptocurrency

#27

I have long wondered how cryptocurrency fans would answer the question: ‘Would you be happy if the crypto-utopia you bring up happens in the next 10 years, and all value is stored/transacted through a cryptocurrency, but it was a coin that you do not possess now, nor could you transfer any of you current currencies into it?’ Say tomorrow someone releases the one true coin, but no one notices. All other cryptocurrenci…

[deleted]

Re: A faster, more efficient cryptocurrency

#28

Is data usage a big problem for Bitcoin?

Not really. The biggest problem is getting more of the participants of the network bootstrapped with a fully validating node. Most people right now choose to rely on others instead which defeats the purpose of Bitcoin and makes the network overall insecure.

The chain is, what, 200 GB now?

Re: A faster, more efficient cryptocurrency

#30

I have long wondered how cryptocurrency fans would answer the question: ‘Would you be happy if the crypto-utopia you bring up happens in the next 10 years, and all value is stored/transacted through a cryptocurrency, but it was a coin that you do not possess now, nor could you transfer any of you current currencies into it?’ Say tomorrow someone releases the one true coin, but no one notices. All other cryptocurrenci…

I am a cryptocurrency fan and developer who wants to build services on top of cryptocurrency networks.

I want a cheap, fast, decentralized solution for token ownership with a great user experience. I want to build back-end solutions for crypto-tokens representing digital collectables, in-game items, etc.

I need a critical mass of users before these services start to become viable as a business model. Thus I need a cryptocurrency for tokens to succeed in a meaningful way. And I want this regardless of whether I own the native token of this network.

Post reply on HN