Show HN: Server Hunter – Easily browse over 11,000 VPS and Dedicated Servers

What's new in ServerHunter?

- Improved search results display on mobile

- Smarter text searches

- New filter: BGP Sessions

- Badges for 'Annual billing' and 'NAT IPv4'

- Separate page for "Write a review"

- Preserving newlines in reviews

- Added a new "Price per specification" option to sorting and columns

- Added a graph with pricing history in offer's page

- Ability to save your favorite searches

- Added offers from several providers

Our VPS giveaway is ending soon, join now for a chance to win a VPS subscription for one year. Enter here: https://www.serverhunter.com/giveaway.

I am wondering who is providing the information? Vultr list their "Dedicated" as 8 CPU, when it is not dedicated by Cloud VM, which I presume it is shared. And its CPU are not CPU Core but CPU Threads.

These differences make the comparison a harder. Because in Dedicated you talk Core count, in Cloud VM you talk Thread Count ( vCPU ).

Sorry about that! They should all be cores rather than threads. In the case of Vultr, we get the information from their API: https://api.vultr.com/v1/plans/list_baremetal - "cpu_count":8

Usually, we rely on our own database for core count and speed, but Vultr doesn't actually mention the CPU model in their API either.

For now, I've hardcoded a fix in our backend and I've contacted Vultr whether they can clear up their API in regards to cores vs threads.

Thanks for letting us know! :)

P.S: Every offer has a "Is some information missing or inaccurate? Let us know!" link at the bottom, in case you find more mistakes.

If you distinguish broken and non-broken IPv4, maybe you should also distinguish broken and non-broken IPv6? Currently, it's impossible to distinguish offers with a proper /48 from broken crap with a single /64 or even less, which makes the comparison mostly useless for me, as there is a lot of broken crap in that market to wade through.

How did you collect all this data? How do you keep it updated?