"Apple and Google accused of hosting Saudi gov't app that tracks women " is a weird phrasing. It's absolutely, 100% verifiably true they host it, as the article plainly states: > Both Google Play and iTunes host Absher, a government web service that allows men to specify when and how women can cross Saudi borders, and to get close to real-time SMS updates when they travel.
Kind of beside the point, too. The bigger news and greater surprise is that the Saudis have an app to track & apprehend women who try to leave! Like "What an outrage that Google hosts this " isn't quiiite what I was thinking...
Apple, Google criticised for Saudi Absher app that tracks women
81–90 of 345 posts
Re: Apple, Google criticised for Saudi Absher app that tracks women
#82Earlier quoted context omitted.
Don't worry, they own some Lyft too.
Less, though. So Lyft it is. Not that there’s really any way you can ever control who owns shares of a public company, but if the government or its proxy is on record as a large shareholder, that’s something.
Re: Apple, Google criticised for Saudi Absher app that tracks women
#83Earlier quoted context omitted.
Holy shit, I can't believe this is happening in the 21st century.
Technology only gives you gadgetry, not morals. Hasn't anyone in Silicon Valley realized this yet? They're building a huge technological cage to control the masses.
Re: Apple, Google criticised for Saudi Absher app that tracks women
#84I don’t agree with the kingdom of Saudi Arabia’s stances, but I also feel like keeping a list of each state that violates human rights is not in Tim Cook’s or Sundar Pichai’s job description. If we are just being honest with ourselves the list of countries in which you can do business approaches 0 if we call out the violators. Secondly, the last time I checked a company’s mandate is to abide by the laws of the countr…
Re: Apple, Google criticised for Saudi Absher app that tracks women
#85Earlier quoted context omitted.
Less, though. So Lyft it is. Not that there’s really any way you can ever control who owns shares of a public company, but if the government or its proxy is on record as a large shareholder, that’s something.
Neither are public companies.
Re: Apple, Google criticised for Saudi Absher app that tracks women
#86Background on the methods used to control women in Saudi Arabia:
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2019-02-04/escape-from-saudi-the...
"Escape From Saudi", a 4corners report on the same:
Re: Apple, Google criticised for Saudi Absher app that tracks women
#87Earlier quoted context omitted.
Kind of beside the point, too. The bigger news and greater surprise is that the Saudis have an app to track & apprehend women who try to leave! Like "What an outrage that Google hosts this " isn't quiiite what I was thinking...
In saudi arabia, women are property. This is no different than an app to track a stolen car or lost pet. Compared to all the stuff men are allowed to do to/with their women... this app is probably the least outrageous wrong. We need to get mad at the countries who support the real physical harms, those that enable abuse or at least do very little to prevent it.
Re: Apple, Google criticised for Saudi Absher app that tracks women
#88Re: Apple, Google criticised for Saudi Absher app that tracks women
#89Feel free to hack this website. Because this kind of behavior is not acceptable, this is a literal totalitarian nightmare.
Re: Apple, Google criticised for Saudi Absher app that tracks women
#90I can’t believe that Lyft doesn’t cover the Bay Area with billboards that say “Saudi Arabia beats women and owns 10% of Uber.” “Saudi Arabia murders gay people and owns 10% of Uber.” “Saudi Arabia crucified two people last year and owns 10% of Uber.”
They can't because Saudi Arabia also owns part of Lyft (2.3%): https://www.reuters.com/article/lyft-kingdom-holding-ma/saud...