Earlier quoted context omitted.
By the way, China is the one and only foreign market where GM ever managed to sell their bad cars.
You mean SAIC-GM (51% SAIC, 49% GM JV of course). Buick is considered a decent brand in China. American brands are more competitive with Japanese brands in China due a fluke: as all of them are made in human labor intensive factories (vs. using more robots), the quality of Japanese designed cars has gone way down to the point that Toyota and Honda aren't thought of as being very good cars like they are in the states.
Asia-Pacific is home to a rise in new self-made billionaires
91–100 of 123 posts
Re: Asia-Pacific is home to a rise in new self-made billionaires
#92Earlier quoted context omitted.
Xiaomi is another one, their build quality is good and they make a whole bunch of actually useful non "tech" things like escooters, air filters, vaccuums. I don't know if they're shady with finances or data collection though
> useful non "tech" things like escooters, air filters, vaccuums. Since when scooters, air filters, and vacuums turned "not a tech?"
Re: Asia-Pacific is home to a rise in new self-made billionaires
#93Earlier quoted context omitted.
It's not like it's particularly bad luck. A marriage certificate is not a requirement of getting married.
But without it, you get no household registration as a married couple, which means no birth certificate, which means no household registration and lifelong non-personhood for the child
> Sec. 192.001. REGISTRATION REQUIRED. The birth of each child born in this state shall be registered.
Children receive birth certificates regardless of whether their parents are married, or are citizens, or any other consideration. There is no requirement for a marriage certificate, or for anything else.
It's also not true that you can't be registered as a married couple without a marriage certificate. You can, and it's easy.
Edit: You're probably talking about China, not Texas.
Re: Asia-Pacific is home to a rise in new self-made billionaires
#94Earlier quoted context omitted.
Just like the Chinese got no chance to vote on America's unilateral sanctions against Iran, but are still subjected to them.
Iran was under UN sanctions at the time Meng violated those sanctions. China is on the UN security council, and as a permanent member, they have a veto. They did get a vote, and they voted yes. Are you somehow not aware of this? They were a founding member of the UN, and have been on the Security Council since it's beginning. They have abstained or voted yes on every UN action that involves the SC (international peac…
Re: Asia-Pacific is home to a rise in new self-made billionaires
#95Re: Asia-Pacific is home to a rise in new self-made billionaires
#96Count me skeptical about of some of these 'self-made' billionaires. Pinduoduo for example, as with many Chinese companies, has been accused of falsifying revenues to pump stock prices. Yes, this stuff happens in the US as well (we all remember Enron and Theranos), but to what extent, are the statements of these companies transparent and well-audited, and regulated by government differs by region. And Bitmain? Is it t…
Self made wealth is almost always a product of an entire community.
Re: Asia-Pacific is home to a rise in new self-made billionaires
#97Count me skeptical about of some of these 'self-made' billionaires. Pinduoduo for example, as with many Chinese companies, has been accused of falsifying revenues to pump stock prices. Yes, this stuff happens in the US as well (we all remember Enron and Theranos), but to what extent, are the statements of these companies transparent and well-audited, and regulated by government differs by region. And Bitmain? Is it t…
Even the legit examples are bullshit, I hate the term self-made (b|m)illionaire because almost all of them came from some kind of privilege that enabled it, and lucky circumstances that precipitate their rise. Take these Atlassian blokes who like to tell the story of starting a company on $20k of credit card debt and a dream to make a living wage without working for someone else. That story doesn't mention they came…
Re: Asia-Pacific is home to a rise in new self-made billionaires
#98Earlier quoted context omitted.
> useful non "tech" things like escooters, air filters, vaccuums. Since when scooters, air filters, and vacuums turned "not a tech?"
before some starup in Silicon Valley started related business
Re: Asia-Pacific is home to a rise in new self-made billionaires
#99Earlier quoted context omitted.
The tech can be amazing, but the business itself can still be essentially, a kind of a ponzi scam. The vast majority of people cannot make money from an Antminer S15 unless they're able to steal electricity or get it super cheap. At current predicted hash rates, power consumption, and BTC prices, these miners are a wash, or net negative. ( https://www.asicminervalue.com/miners/bitmain/antminer-s15-2... ) That makes t…
This is not what a scam is. An Antminer isn't a license to print money. It's a device for hashing blocks. This is like calling Sony a scam because they sell video cameras to aspiring YouTube stars who never make money out of their aspirations. It matters, because there are plenty of scams out there, where people exchange money in good faith and receive a substandard good, or nothing at all, in return. If Bitmain does…
However, the vast majority of people purchasing ASIC miners think they're going to make money from them.
Another example: GPUs, some people bought em for mining, but independent of mining they accelerate games and digital content creation, and lots of other useful computation.
Re: Asia-Pacific is home to a rise in new self-made billionaires
#100Count me skeptical about of some of these 'self-made' billionaires. Pinduoduo for example, as with many Chinese companies, has been accused of falsifying revenues to pump stock prices. Yes, this stuff happens in the US as well (we all remember Enron and Theranos), but to what extent, are the statements of these companies transparent and well-audited, and regulated by government differs by region. And Bitmain? Is it t…
Even the legit examples are bullshit, I hate the term self-made (b|m)illionaire because almost all of them came from some kind of privilege that enabled it, and lucky circumstances that precipitate their rise. Take these Atlassian blokes who like to tell the story of starting a company on $20k of credit card debt and a dream to make a living wage without working for someone else. That story doesn't mention they came…
The reality is that wealth and "privilege" are a scale: no matter who you are in the world, there are both people above and below you, in terms of advantages.