Live data from Hacker News

No Thank You, Mr. Pecker

medium.com

351–360 of 783 posts

Re: No Thank You, Mr. Pecker

#351

Important note: This is written by Jeff Bezos himself . Normally, the Bezos affair story would be gossipy, but this alleges extortion , extraordinarily. (Also, why is Jeff Bezos using Medium? He owns a newspaper.)

One thing for sure is that he cannot retro-actively edit an article on Medium, without medium knowing about it.

I am not sure the same thing can be true with his own newspaper.

Re: No Thank You, Mr. Pecker

#352
post #297

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Which makes stories like this a lot more interesting: https://motherboard.vice.com/en_us/article/mby7kq/malware-to... > Saudi Arabia paid $55 million to purchase iPhone malware made by NSO Group, according to a recent report by Israeli newspaper Haaretz The Saudis really disliked the Washington Post digging into their murder of Khashoggi, it doesn't seem too crazy that they set their sights on the boss and ended up s…

Worth pointing out that the only mobile device that Bezos has apparently tweeted from (publically) seems to be an iPhone. Doesn’t mean he didn’t have a burner phone for conducting his affairs of course. https://twitter.com/dancow/status/1093732934299856899

Genuinely disappointed that it is not a Fire phone.

Re: No Thank You, Mr. Pecker

#353

Earlier quoted context omitted.

They are threatening to post photos of him sexting. Calling that "just details" is a stunning lack of empathy. Even if you'd personally be unperturbed by a similar situation, the vast majority of humans would find it humiliating and invasive in the extreme.

> They are threatening to post photos of him sexting. Is a photo published in a disreputable magazine significantly worse than the information already out so far which already got people thinking about him sexting anyway combined with losing custody of ~70 billion dollars in the coming divorce? I'm not so sure. Their privacy was already thoroughly invaded before this latest development.

> Is a photo published in a disreputable magazine significantly worse than the information already out so far which already got people thinking about him sexting anyway

Yes, unequivocally. I suspect any PR person would agree. You can doubt information published by a disreputable source, but most people believe the images they see, even in this deep faked era.

Re: No Thank You, Mr. Pecker

#354

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I don't agree. He's taking an ostensibly 'strong stand' - but he's also furthering the public furor. Before he was a 'somewhat well known person' but now he's really, really going to be famous, and probably not for the right reasons. And by the way, most people probably don't know how he is yet. That's hard to grasp because we certainly do - but if you walk out your door right now, take a stroll and ask people if the…

I am curious, if you were in Jeff Bezos place what would you do? I mean, what would you do after you get that email from NE lawyer?

I said in my post I would probably make a carefully worded statement through a spokesperson for the public record, possibly including the email, and avoid in any way creating something the press or anyone else could buy into as clickbait narrative. Stay out of the public eye entirely, no photos, personal quotes, attacks etc..

Bezos will not win if this blows up. He'll win in the eyes of a few people, and lose in others, and it will only create a stain on his record.

Think of the legacy of Bill and Melinda Gates. It's relatively unscathed.

Re: No Thank You, Mr. Pecker

#355

> Bezos Exposes Pecker HuffPo headline

I find this extremely irresponsible. This is a serious issue.

I am beginning to think that this is a conspiracy by AMI to damage Washington Post. If Jeff would have done something as requested by AMI, they would again use that against him and start shouting that WaPo has lost credibility, since Jeff is so easy to blackmail.

Re: No Thank You, Mr. Pecker

#356
post #285

It seems like a lot of people are not reading between the lines of this post. Bezos apparently believes that he was hacked by either the US or Saudi government and that now one or both of those governments are using the National Enquirer as an attack dog against him. That accusation is much bigger than any other piece of this story. EDIT: Here [1] is a reporter from the Washington Post backing that up. The Bezos' cam…

This is the most salacious and wild hacker news I’ve ever read.

[deleted]

Re: No Thank You, Mr. Pecker

#358
post #242
post #186

Earlier quoted context omitted.

[flagged]

[flagged]

I think it's that people are allergic to partisan flamebait, with good reason. Also, these comments usually break the site guidelines. So do comments alleging astroturfing and related things (bottage, shillage) without evidence, so could you guys please not post those?

https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html

Re: No Thank You, Mr. Pecker

#360

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> literally has tons of money If his keeps his money in $100 bills, then you're right. $136 billion would weigh about 1,230 metric tons. More likely, his cash consists of electronic entries in bank systems which weigh substantially less.

If you count the weight of the servers required to service all the funds at the institutions his money resides at, and the percentage of his funds compared to the overall amount at that institution, it still might be tons.

[deleted]
Post reply on HN