What happened was we failed to consider the consequences of centralization: - Google with its search - Tumblr (or Medium) with its blogging platform - Twitter, Facebook, and Instagram with their connection to friends, family, and news - Starbucks with its roaming internet access - Youtube with its ubiquitous video distribution - PayPal with its payment network - Apple with its walled garden App Store It's no accident…
Sex censorship killed the internet we love
391–400 of 520 posts
Re: Sex censorship killed the internet we love
#392Again and again I see the comments of how crazy it is that we allow violence in films/TV/anywhere, but not sex which is peaceful and harmless -- as if this were some kind of idiocy or hypocrisy. There's a good reason we try to draw lines between areas where sex is "allowed" and "not allowed" -- because it's arousing and has the potential to be greatly embarrassing . It's private , in a way that violence isn't. I seri…
Personally, I'm inclined to think that the answer is yes. I think it's all relative. And I think our censorship is directly linked to the fact that it's uncomfortable.
Re: Sex censorship killed the internet we love
#393Wow. This whole thread and Right Wing Conservatives and Republicans aren't called out once? Hacker News has become as pandering to the right wing as Sheryl Sandberg and Facebook. Hypocrites.
Not sure if serious, but sex censorship is mostly a bi-partisan endeavor these days. See, e.g. the whole controversy around Patreon, where creators of sexually-suggestive content and right-wing/conservative intellectuals are both facing the prospect of being "de-platformed" for political reasons.
Neo-Nazis (or as you referred to them, "conservative intellectuals") are being targeted because their hate speech promotes intolerance and causes pain, suffering and encourages right wing extremists, who then go out and kill people with guns and cars.
Try to learn the concept of false equivalency and stop pandering.
Re: Sex censorship killed the internet we love
#3941. Read article 2. notice that r/dragonsfuckingcars isn't 404'd 3. Disagree with article
Warning: that sub is sort of NSFW and cannot be unseen once seen.
On the other, if that really happened it would be hilarious and I'd love to do a podcast fundraiser with that person after the sting wore off.
Re: Sex censorship killed the internet we love
#395Again and again I see the comments of how crazy it is that we allow violence in films/TV/anywhere, but not sex which is peaceful and harmless -- as if this were some kind of idiocy or hypocrisy. There's a good reason we try to draw lines between areas where sex is "allowed" and "not allowed" -- because it's arousing and has the potential to be greatly embarrassing . It's private , in a way that violence isn't. I seri…
There was a strong nudity culture in germany/europe and nudity wasn't something that was entirely sexual. But now it seems to be entirely sexual, at least on the internet.
> When I Google something in a meeting or in front of my mother, I do not want sexual results to appear because some term has an alternate meaning
I don't agee. Not every mention of sexuality is arousing and when something sexual appears and is embarassing for you, that's a cultural thing. I don't see sexual things appearing when you google stuff front of your mother as embarassing in by human nature, I think it's entirely cultural. I honestly don't know whether I would care? My mother is an adult human being after all and smart enought to know that there's an alternate meaning and I didn't want to google sexual stuff with her! I really don't think this would be a problem at all?
> but we certainly don't want to watch a steamy sex scene together
This was weird when I was a teenager, where steamy sex scenes can overwhelme you very quick. But sex scenes are an important part of many movies, it's part of human nature after all. For example, I like art and my father likes art. When I am in my parents city and we go into a museum together, there are many artworks displaying nudity and some are explicitly concerened with the various forms of sexuality. There's no akwardness there, because we're both adults.
> So having major internet services like Google and Facebook default to being non-sexual seems like a pretty smart move to me.
It may be a smart move from a corporate point of view, but I really think it shapes our culture and defines what is a taboo and what not, they are just too powerfull. I don't think it's good that you can't post pictures of nudity on facebook. Nudity doesn't have to sexual. And if you argue that you shouldn't do that because some eployer could google you and sees you half naked, then that's also cultural, I think. Also, there's a privacy setting in facebook.
Re: Sex censorship killed the internet we love
#396Re: Sex censorship killed the internet we love
#397Earlier quoted context omitted.
Kids shouldn’t really be violent, both in their childhood and throughout the rest of their lives.
Yeah but leave them alone and one will hit the other. You need adult supervision to stop it all going Lord of the Flies.
Re: Sex censorship killed the internet we love
#398Again and again I see the comments of how crazy it is that we allow violence in films/TV/anywhere, but not sex which is peaceful and harmless -- as if this were some kind of idiocy or hypocrisy. There's a good reason we try to draw lines between areas where sex is "allowed" and "not allowed" -- because it's arousing and has the potential to be greatly embarrassing . It's private , in a way that violence isn't. I seri…
My knee jerk reaction is actually to agree with you wholeheartedly: sex is arousing and violence isn't. But if I can play devil's advocate, isn't it possible that if sex was more commonplace and less censored it would be less arousing? Sure there's a biological aspect, but I think a lot of sex is psychological. And if our threshold for what was considered "exciting" was brought down by a complete normalization of nud…
Evidence of this is the female nipple.
Re: Sex censorship killed the internet we love
#399Earlier quoted context omitted.
> Not prudish here, just also very conscious [that sex] should be between life-long committed people That is prudish. To be perfectly clear, it’s entirely fine to decide that this is the right thing for yourself. But the way your comment is written makes it clear that you think this is the only correct way, for everyone. Yeah, that’s extremely prudish.
definition of prudish: `having or revealing a tendency to be easily shocked by matters relating to sex or nudity; excessively concerned with sexual propriety.` Having a belief that a loved one would be happier if they do not take drugs and acting on that to attempt to persuade them is love and concern (and they are free to disagree with me). Having a belief that a loved one would be happier if refrained from using se…
Re: Sex censorship killed the internet we love
#400I find the US prudishness thing so fascinating. I'm travelling at the moment, and meeting lots of Americans (and Europeans for contrast). There's definitely a huge difference in tolerance for swearing and blasphemy. Also several well-educated and seemingly intelligent Americans who hold strong racist opinions. But that's another subject. I guess it all comes down to the religion. Americans do seem to be more religiou…
>Also several well-educated and seemingly intelligent Americans who hold strong racist opinions. But that's another subject. Bring up Muslims or Roma people to a European and you'll find this isn't a uniquely American problem.