Earlier quoted context omitted.
A talk entitled "How to teach programming to your loved ones: Enabling students over example-driven teaching" and you reply "Step 1: You don't"... that's pretty harsh. How would you say the author should have approached it instead?
It's harsh because it's true. There's no reason to teach love one's coding. In fact, there's no reason to teach them anything that does not resonate with them naturally.
I took the talk as learning how to teach the topic better to your loved ones or anyone else for that matter.
(I haven't watched it yet)