Earlier quoted context omitted.
> it doesn't sit well with me that Apple yields so much power on what software their phones can run after it sells them At the end of the day, you can compile and run anything on your machine. This is just regulating distribution. Given the specific breaches at hand by Facebook and Google, a balance seems to have been found (acceptable to most users) between freedom and security.
Can you install rogue apps (i.e. not from apple's store) without jailbreaking the device?
Apple blocks Google from running its internal iOS apps
31–40 of 667 posts
Re: Apple blocks Google from running its internal iOS apps
#32Earlier quoted context omitted.
> it doesn't sit well with me that Apple yields so much power on what software their phones can run after it sells them At the end of the day, you can compile and run anything on your machine. This is just regulating distribution. Given the specific breaches at hand by Facebook and Google, a balance seems to have been found (acceptable to most users) between freedom and security.
That is true only in the most technical of senses. Practically, Apple has near complete control over what is allowed to execute on an iOS device.
It's free to get one though, but it only lasts for a week or so. You can pay to become a developer and I think you get one that lasts a year instead.
Re: Apple blocks Google from running its internal iOS apps
#33I don't want to pass judgment on whether Google (or in the previous case, Facebook) was in the wrong, but it doesn't sit well with me that Apple wields so much power on what software their phones can run after it sells them. You may very well think that they're using their power sparingly and benevolently, but who is to say that will be the case next time around?
> it doesn't sit well with me that Apple yields so much power on what software their phones can run after it sells them At the end of the day, you can compile and run anything on your machine. This is just regulating distribution. Given the specific breaches at hand by Facebook and Google, a balance seems to have been found (acceptable to most users) between freedom and security.
Re: Apple blocks Google from running its internal iOS apps
#34Positive PR hit for Apple vs minor inconvenience for competitor/client...easy decision by Apple.
Unless Google takes action against Apple.
I can’t see Google coming out of anything like that unscathed. Best case they lose customers, worst case they get an anti-trust case thrown at them.
Unless there is something else that Google can do that will work in their favor that I’m missing.
Re: Apple blocks Google from running its internal iOS apps
#35Rumor has it that Google's subsequent requests for clarification to Apple have gone entirely unanswered, save for automated messages stating that Apple's decision on this matter should be regarded as "final" and "binding", and that no further statement from Apple should be expected.
Re: Apple blocks Google from running its internal iOS apps
#36Earlier quoted context omitted.
> it doesn't sit well with me that Apple yields so much power on what software their phones can run after it sells them At the end of the day, you can compile and run anything on your machine. This is just regulating distribution. Given the specific breaches at hand by Facebook and Google, a balance seems to have been found (acceptable to most users) between freedom and security.
At the end of the day, you can compile and run anything on your machine. Not really. You have to pay the ransom^W^W$100 for a developer account every year.
Re: Apple blocks Google from running its internal iOS apps
#37I feel less vengeful satisfaction from this one, but I respect that they're applying their rules consistently. I just hope it doesn't backfire. On a totally personal level, I'd rather Facebook feel the hurt for its audacity than Apple be forced to backtrack because they made too many enemies.
As mentioned in a separate Verge article-
"One giant platform declared another giant platform’s market research program inappropriate, then disappeared it with a Thanos-style finger snap"
also from same article, attributed to Nilay Patel
"Hi, I’m the nagging voice in the back of your head pointing out that it’s pretty intense that Apple can simply decide to prevent people from running code on their phones."
Edited for punctuation
Re: Apple blocks Google from running its internal iOS apps
#38I feel less vengeful satisfaction from this one, but I respect that they're applying their rules consistently. I just hope it doesn't backfire. On a totally personal level, I'd rather Facebook feel the hurt for its audacity than Apple be forced to backtrack because they made too many enemies.
Similar concerns. I think this might, in the long term, be detrimental to Apple if companies begin to revolt against their overarching, seemingly totalitarian power regardless of if the intent is noble. As mentioned in a separate Verge article- "One giant platform declared another giant platform’s market research program inappropriate, then disappeared it with a Thanos-style finger snap" also from same article, attri…
Re: Apple blocks Google from running its internal iOS apps
#39Earlier quoted context omitted.
> it doesn't sit well with me that Apple yields so much power on what software their phones can run after it sells them At the end of the day, you can compile and run anything on your machine. This is just regulating distribution. Given the specific breaches at hand by Facebook and Google, a balance seems to have been found (acceptable to most users) between freedom and security.
That is true only in the most technical of senses. Practically, Apple has near complete control over what is allowed to execute on an iOS device.
Re: Apple blocks Google from running its internal iOS apps
#40Rumor has it that Google's subsequent requests for clarification to Apple have gone entirely unanswered, save for automated messages stating that Apple's decision on this matter should be regarded as "final" and "binding", and that no further statement from Apple should be expected.